Variable split virtual address space allocation with multi-system compatibility

ABSTRACT

A virtual memory system is disclosed, providing a virtual address space of virtual addresses simultaneously available to a given process. The virtual address space includes a process private space accessible only to a given process, as well as a shared space of virtual addresses potentially accessible to two or more processes. The process private space includes virtual addresses on one side of a private/shared virtual address boundary, while the virtual addresses within the shared space are on the other side of the private/shared virtual address boundary. The private/shared boundary is ensured to be greater than a predetermined highest process private (or shared) virtual address of a different virtual memory system, and less than or equal to a predetermined lowest shared (or process private) virtual address of that different virtual memory system. Compatibility is ensured for software written for the different virtual memory system, allowing such software to run without modification on the present system. In an example embodiment, the private/shared boundary is set responsive to a user input reflecting a desired ratio between shared and process private space.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The disclosed invention relates generally to memory management incomputer systems, and more specifically to a system for allocatingshared and private space within a virtual memory system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

One of the elements within a computer operating system is memorymanagement. Memory management consists of hardware and software thatcontrols the allocation and use of physical memory. The effect of memorymanagement is exemplified in multiprogramming systems in which severalprocesses reside in memory at the same time. Memory management typicallyincludes a virtual memory system. The virtual memory system provides theCPU (central processing unit) with mapping information. The CPUgenerates virtual addresses when an image is executed. Before thesevirtual addresses can be used to access instructions and data, they mustbe translated into physical addresses. Memory management softwaremaintains tables of mapping information (page tables) that keep track ofwhere each page of virtual addresses is located in physical memory. TheCPU uses this mapping information when it translates virtual addressesto physical addresses. The mapping of virtual addresses through pagetables in a virtual memory system provides a large virtual addressspace, and allows programs to run on hardware with smaller physicalmemory configurations.

The range of virtual addresses is referred to as the virtual addressspace. The virtual address space is that set of virtual addressesaccessible by the current process. A process is current when its processcontext is loaded into the CPU and the process is actively executing.Only one process may be current on a given CPU at a given time. Inexisting systems, the virtual address space is divided into a sharedaddress space, sometimes referred to as the system address space, and aper-process address space. The per-process address space is referred toas process private space. The shared address space maps code and datashared by all processes, and that is available to any process that iscurrent. The shared address space may for example contain operatingsystem code and data used by all processes. The process private spacemaps code and data associated with and available to one specific processonly when that specific process is current. When the process context ischanged, a new process is made current, and the mapping of processprivate space is changed to map process private space to process privatecode and data of that process.

A page table is typically used to map the virtual address space tophysical memory, in units of "pages". A page is a multibyte unit ofmemory having a predetermined size. The specific size of a page variesfrom system to system. A page table contains page table entries (PTEs),each one of which defines a relationship (referred to as a "mapping")between a single virtual page and a physical page of memory. Thephysical address of a physical page of memory is referred to as a pageframe number (PFN). Thus a given virtual page of memory is "mapped" to apage of physical memory by a specific PTE, and similarly that physicalpage of memory is "mapped" to the virtual page by that specific PTE. ThePTE in that case is referred to as "mapping" the virtual page and thephysical page of memory.

In existing computer systems, page table entries within a page table maybe located in either process private or shared space. Where page tableentries mapping process private space for a given process are locatedwithin process private space, the contents of those page table entriescan ordinarily only be accessed when that specific process is current.Thus for a process to access the process private page table entries ofanother process, a context switch is typically required.

Among existing systems, two alternatives are used to allocate thevirtual address space into shared and process private space. In thefirst method, referred to as an "even split", one half of the potentialvirtual address space is reserved for process private space, and theremaining one half is reserved for shared space. An undesirable aspectof even split allocation is that it frequently reserves far more sharedspace than is truly needed for operation. Such excess shared space wouldbe more advantageously allocated to processes running on computersystem.

In the second virtual address allocation method, referred to as "unevensplit", the operating system allocates a smaller portion of the virtualaddress space for shared space. The amount of shared space allocatedfrom the virtual address space for shared space is an amount sufficientto satisfy the needs of the operating system, leaving the remainder foruse by users (processes) of the operating system.

Software written to run in conjunction with a particular operatingsystem may rely on how the virtual address space is split between sharedspace and process private space. For example, software written toexecute under a system using existing even split virtual addressallocation may not be able to run on an uneven split system, and viceversa. Thus in existing systems there is a compatibility problem whenmoving software between even split and uneven split systems.

In addition, as computer technology advances, the size of virtualaddresses, and virtual address spaces is growing. For example computersystems are increasingly employing 64-bit addresses as opposed to theearlier 32-bit address technology. As the virtual address space of suchnewer systems grows, it becomes less practical to use even splitsystems, since an even split of a very large virtual address spaceresults in allocation of far more shared space than is ordinarilyrequired.

Thus there is needed a new virtual memory system, which providescompatibility to software written for either an even split or unevensplit virtual address allocation. The new system should not require evensplit allocation, in order that larger virtual address spaces beefficiently allocated. And the new system should be easily tunable toreflect the requirements of its operating environment.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with principles of the invention, there is disclosed avirtual memory system providing a virtual address space of virtualaddresses simultaneously available to a given process. Within thevirtual address space there is included a process private spaceaccessible only to a given process. The process private space includesthose virtual addresses for example below a private/shared virtualaddress boundary. The virtual address space further includes a sharedspace of virtual addresses for example above the private/shared virtualaddress boundary. The shared space is potentially accessible to two ormore processes.

The private/shared boundary is ensured to be greater than apredetermined highest process private virtual address of a differentvirtual memory system, and less than a predetermined lowest sharedvirtual address of that different virtual memory system. Compatibilityis ensured for software written for the different virtual memory system,allowing such software to run without modification on the presentsystem.

In an example embodiment, the private/shared boundary is set responsiveto a user input reflecting a desired ratio between shared and processprivate space. In the example embodiment, the private/shared boundary isset between an upper limit and a lower limit. The lower limit includes ahighest process private virtual address of the different virtual memorysystem. The highest process private virtual address of the differentvirtual memory system is contained in a lower `m` bits of the lowerlimit. Each bit of the lower limit above the lower `m` bits (bits m andhigher where the lowest bit is numbered 0), contains a value equal tozero.

Further in the example embodiment, a lower `m` bits of the upper limitcontain a lowest shared virtual address of the different virtual memorysystem. Each bit of the upper limit above the lower `m` bits (bits m andhigher) contains a value equal to one (1)

Thus the new virtual memory system provides compatibility to softwarewritten for a different system, where the different system may haveeither an even split or uneven split virtual address allocation. The newsystem does not require even split allocation, and permits a largervirtual address space to be efficiently allocated between shared andprocess private space. The new system further is tunable via user inputto reflect the requirements of its operating environment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing features and other aspects of the invention will nowbecome apparent when the accompanying description is read in conjunctionwith the following drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualmemory system;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the format of an example embodiment ofa page table entry;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualaddress space divided into process private and shared space;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualmemory system having an even split allocation of process private spaceand shared space;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualmemory system having an uneven split allocation of process private spaceand shared space;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualmemory system having multi-system compatibility;

FIG. 7 is a flow chart showing an example embodiment of steps performedto set up a virtual memory system having multi-system compatibility;

FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a page tablestructure and virtual address format;

FIG. 9 is a flow chart showing an example embodiment of steps performedto access a page table entry mapping a predetermined physical page;

FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing a first example embodiment of aphysical page data base entry;

FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a first example embodiment of stepsperformed to obtain a virtual address of a page table entry currentlymapping a predetermined physical page;

FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing a second example embodiment of aphysical page data base entry;

FIG. 13 is a flow chart showing a second example embodiment of stepsperformed to obtain a virtual address of a page table entry currentlymapping a predetermined physical page;

FIG. 14 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of stepsperformed to determine if a predetermined physical page is mapped by acurrent page table entry;

FIG. 15 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of aself-mapped page table;

FIG. 16 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualmemory system having a private/shared boundary dividing a self-mappedpage table space, and where the page table space itself separatesprocess private space and shared space;

FIG. 17 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a page tablespace;

FIG. 18 is a flow chart showing steps in an example embodiment of asystem for processing a translation buffer invalidation;

FIG. 19 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualaddress space having an inaccessible gap;

FIG. 20 is a block diagram showing an example embodiment of a virtualmemory region;

FIG. 21 is a flow chart showing steps performed by an example embodimentof a virtual memory allocation routine;

FIG. 22 is a block diagram showing virtual memory allocation performedby an example embodiment of a virtual memory allocation routine;

FIG. 23 is a flow chart showing steps performed by an example embodimentof a virtual memory deallocation routine;

FIG. 24 is a block diagram showing virtual memory deallocation asperformed by an example embodiment of a virtual memory deallocationroutine;

FIG. 25 is a flow chart showing the steps performed by an exampleembodiment of a system for providing access to the page table structureof a non-current process;

FIG. 26 is a block diagram of a computer system illustrating oneembodiment of the use of a data structure for facilitating I/O access ina virtually addressed computer system;

FIG. 27 illustrates one format of the data structure of FIG. 26, wherethe data structure is used to provide fixed size storage of PTE entries;

FIG. 28 illustrates a second formation of the data structure of FIG. 26,where the data structure is used to provide variably sized storage forPTE entries;

FIG. 29 is a flow diagram illustrating the process used for creating anSPTE window for use in an I/O transaction;

FIG. 30 is an example illustrating the contents of memory when providingan SPTE window through the process of FIG. 29;

FIG. 31 illustrates a third format of the data structure of FIG. 26,where the data structure is used to provide an SPTE window as describedin conjunction with FIG. 30; and

FIG. 32 is a flow diagram illustrating the decision process used todetermine which of one of the data structures of FIGS. 27, 28 or 30 areused to perform an I/O transfer in the computer system of FIG. 26.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Now with reference to FIG. 1, an example embodiment of a virtual memorysystem is described. FIG. 1 shows a computer system including an examplememory management system and virtual memory system. A central processingunit (CPU) 10 is shown coupled with a bus 12, which in turn is coupledwith a memory 14. The CPU 10 is shown including a execution unit 16having a program counter (PC) and other registers 18, coupled with amemory management unit 20. The memory management unit 20 is shownincluding a translation buffer 22 as well as a page table base register(PTBR) 24. The execution unit 16 is coupled with the memory managementunit 20.

In the example embodiment of FIG. 1, a process is the basic entityscheduled and executed on the CPU 10. Useful programs may be run by auser within a given process. Each process consists of an address spaceand process context information. The process context information definesthe state of execution of a given process, with respect to certainpredefined register and variable values, for example including thevalues of the PC and other registers 18 and the PTBR 24.

When a process is to be executed, the process context for that processis first made current, for example by writing the values of the PC andother registers 18 and the PTBR 24. The specific process being executedis referred to as the current process. When the current process ischanged, this is referred to as a context switch. The current processcontext defines the mapping of the virtual address space to physicalmemory by indicating the page table entries to be used for virtualaddress translation by the memory management unit 20. This indication tothe memory management unit is made by loading an address indicatingprocess private page table entries of a current process into the PTBR24, for example when a context switch is made.

The memory 14 in FIG. 1 is shown including process private code and datafor several processes, as well as shared code and data. The memory 14 isfurther shown including page table entries mapping the virtual addressesof the process private code and data, as well as the shared code anddata, to physical memory.

Specifically in FIG. 1, the memory 14 is shown including process privatepage table entries 30, mapping the process private code and data withinthe process `A` 32, as well as shared page table entries 26 mapping theshared code and data 28. In the example of FIG. 1, process `A` 32 iscurrently executing, and the code and data within process `A` 32, aswell as the shared code and data 28 are mapped by the current addressspace as defined by the current process context. Shared code and data 28for example includes operating system services, routines, functions anddata available to any currently executing process. Non-current processes`B` 36 and `C` 40 are also shown within the memory 14. Further in memory14 are shown process B private page table entries 34 and process Cprivate page table entries 38, for mapping process private code and datawithin the processes B 36 and C 40 respectively.

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 1, CPU 10 uses physicaladdresses 41 to read the contents of memory locations within the memory14. For example, when process `A` 32 is executing, the PC holds thevirtual address of an instruction to be executed. As the CPU executesinstructions from process A 32 pointed to by the PC, the memorymanagement unit 20 translates virtual addresses 39 within thoseinstructions into physical addresses 41. The memory management unit 20uses the contents of the page table base register 24 to access theprocess `A` private page table entries 30 and the shared page tableentries 26 in order to obtain the physical addresses 41 of code or datain process A 32 itself or of the shared code and data 28.

Further during operation of the elements shown in FIG. 1, as the memorymanagement unit 20 translates the virtual addresses 39 into physicaladdresses 41, a pre-determined number of these translations are storedwithin the translation buffer 22. Those translations stored within thetranslation buffer 22 may be accessed more quickly than translationsobtained by accessing the process A private page table entries 30 orshared page table entries 26. When a translation stored within thetranslation buffer 22 is determined to be no longer valid, for exampleas result of a context switch, that translation must be invalidated sothat it is no longer used by the memory management unit 22.

Thus it is seen in the example of FIG. 1 that virtual addresses 39 aretranslated by the memory management unit 20 into physical addresses 41.Code and data within process A 32 and the shared code and data 28 areaccessible in the current virtual address space. As operation of thesystem continues, and the current process is switched through a contextswitch, one of either process B 36 or process C 40 will become current.When process B 36, for example, becomes current, the location of pagetable entries within process B private page table entries 34 will beindicated by the PTBR 24. Subsequently, code or data within process B 36may be accessed by assertion of virtual addresses 39 to the memorymanagement unit 20. Code and data within process B 36 and the sharedcode and data 28 are then both accessible. It is thus apparent that atany single given time, the code or data for a currently executingprocess as well as the shared code and data 28 are accessible throughthe virtual address space.

Now with regard to FIG. 2 an example embodiment of a page table entry isdescribed. The process private page table entries 30, 34, and 38 asshown in FIG. 1 for example consist of one or more page table entrieshaving the format as shown in FIG. 2. Similarly the shared page tableentries 26 as shown in FIG. 1 are also for example of the format shownin FIG. 2.

The example page table entry shown in FIG. 2 includes a page framenumber (PFN) 44, hardware and software control information 46, and avalid bit 48. The PFN 44 includes some pre-determined number of bits ofthe physical address of the page of physical memory mapped by that pagetable entry 42. The predetermined number of bits of the physical addressare for example sufficient to indicate a page of physical memory. ThePFN 44 is thus a physical address specifying a page of physical memory.In this way each page table entry maps a page of virtual addresses to aphysical page of memory. The hardware and software control information46 includes such information as protection codes defining a level ofaccess required for a process to reference the page of physical memorymapped by the page table entry 42. The valid bit 48 indicates thevalidity of, among other things, the page frame number 44. For example,if the valid bit is 1, then the page frame number 44 provides a validmapping of a virtual page to a physical page that may be used by thememory management unit 20 as shown in FIG. 1.

Now with regard to FIG. 3 an example embodiment of a virtual addressspace divided into process private and shared space is described. InFIG. 3 there is shown a virtual address space 50 divided into a processprivate space 52, for example mapping code and data within process A 32of FIG. 1, and further including a shared space 54 for example mappingthe shared code and data 28 in FIG. 1. The virtual address space 50 isshown extending from a lowest virtual address 56 to a highest virtualaddress 58. The process private space is shown extending from the lowestvirtual address 56 up to a highest private space virtual address 60. Theshared space 54 is shown extending between a lowest shared space virtualaddress 62 and the highest of virtual address 58.

Further shown in FIG. 3 is the process B private space 64 and process Cprivate space 66. Since process B and process C are not the currentprocess (process A is the current process) the process private virtualaddresses in the process private space 52 do not currently map code anddata from within process B or process C. This results because theprocess private portion of a non-current process's virtual address spaceis not resident in the currently active virtual address space.Accordingly any virtual address translated by the memory management unit20 as shown in FIG. 1, that lies between the lowest virtual address 56and the highest process private space virtual address 60, will betranslated by the process A private page table entries 30. Uponassertion of a virtual address between the lowest shared space virtualaddress 62 and the highest virtual address 58, the memory managementunit 20 maps that virtual address to a physical address of shared codeand data 28.

Continuing with regard to the elements shown in FIG. 3, when a contextswitch occurs, and for example process B 36 becomes the current process,then a new process context is loaded into the CPU 10. The new processcontext includes loading an address into the PTBR 24 indicating one ormore of the process B private page table entries 34. Accordingly, afterthe context switch, process private virtual addresses between the lowestvirtual address 56 and the highest process private virtual address 60are mapped to the code and data for process B. However, after thecontext is switched so that process B is the current process, virtualaddresses between the lowest shared space of virtual address 62 and thehighest virtual address 58 continue to be mapped to the shared code anddata 28. Thus it is shown that shared code and data continues to bemapped by the virtual address space independent of the currentlyexecuting process.

Now with regard to FIG. 4 is described an example embodiment of avirtual memory system providing an even split allocation of processprivate space and shared space. FIG. 4 shows a virtual address space 70including a process private space 76 as well as a shared space 78. Forpurposes of example, the virtual address space 70 maps `n` pages ofvirtual addresses. The virtual address space 70 accordingly includesvirtual pages 1 through `n`, for example virtual page 1 80, virtual page2 82, virtual page 3 84, virtual page n/2 86, virtual page (n/2)+1 90,(n/2)+2 92, up to virtual page `n` 94. The virtual address space 70extends from a lowest virtual address 72 up to a highest virtual address74. The lowest virtual address 72 is shown for example as a 32 bitaddress, equal to 00000000 (hexadecimal). The highest virtual address 74is shown for example also as a 32 bit address, equal to FFFFFFFF(hexadecimal).

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 4, when a virtual addresswithin virtual page 1 80 is translated by the memory management unit 20,that translation is based on the mapping information contained in PTE 196. Similarly, when a virtual address within virtual page 2 82 istranslated by the memory management unit 20, that address is translatedbased on the mapping information in PTE 2 98. Similarly translations aremade for other virtual pages within the virtual address space 70,including virtual page 3 84 by mapping information in PTE 3 100, virtualpage n/2 86 by the mapping information in PTE n/2 102 and so on. Thus itis shown that PTE 1 96 through PTE n/2 102 are used to map virtualaddresses within the process private space 76. These page table entriesare referred to as process private PTEs.

PTE (n/2)+1 104 through PTE `n` 108 are used to map the virtualaddresses in the shared space 78. These page table entries are referredto as shared page table entries. In the example of FIG. 4, an even splitallocation is made between the process private space 76 and the sharedspace 78. Accordingly in the example of FIG. 4 the number of virtualpages in the process private space 76 is equal to the number of virtualpages in the shared space 78. Similarly, the number of process privatepage table entries in FIG. 4 is equal to the number of shared page tableentries.

Now with regard to FIG. 5 is described an example embodiment of avirtual memory system providing an uneven split allocation of processprivate space and shared space. For purposes of example the virtualaddress space 110 is shown mapping `n` pages of virtual addresses. Ashared space 118 in FIG. 5 is shown including `m` virtual pages. Aprocess private space 116 in FIG. 5 is shown including `n`-`m` virtualpages.

Accordingly the virtual address space 110 in FIG. 5 is shown includingvirtual pages 1 through `n`, for example virtual page 1 120, virtualpage 2 122, virtual page 3 124, virtual page (n-m) 126, virtual page(n-m)+1 128, virtual page (n-m)+2 130, up through virtual page n 132.The virtual address space 110 in FIG. 5 is shown to extend from a lowestvirtual address 112 to a highest virtual address 114. In expressing64-bit addresses in hexadecimal format, a `.` is inserted between theeight most significant digits and the eight least significant digits asa convention to ease readability. For purposes of example the lowestvirtual address 112 is shown as a 64-bit address equal to00000000.00000000 (hexadecimal). The highest virtual address 114 isshown as a 64-bit address equal to FFFFFFFF.FFFFFFFF (hexadecimal). Theboundary between the process private space 116 and the shared space 118in FIG. 5 is shown by private/shared virtual address boundary 127.

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 5, virtual addresseswithin virtual page 1 120 are translated using the contents of PTE 1134, virtual addresses within virtual page 2 122 are translated usingthe contents of PTE 2 136, virtual addresses within virtual page 3 124are translated using the contents of PTE 3 138, and virtual addresseswithin virtual page n-m 126 are translated using the contents of PTE n-m140. In this way all process private space virtual addresses are mappedby page table entries 1 through n-m, where n is the total number ofvirtual pages and m is the number of pages in the shared space 118.Similarly, virtual addresses between (and including) the beginning ofvirtual page (n-m)+1 128 up to those within virtual page n 132 aremapped by the page table entries (n-m)+1 142 through page table entry n146. Accordingly, the page table entries 1 through n-m are consideredprivate page table entries, while the page table entries (n-m)+1 throughn are considered shared page table entries.

Now with reference to FIG. 6 an example embodiment of a virtual memorysystem having multi-system compatibility is described. The embodiment ofFIG. 6 provides uneven split virtual address allocation with even splitcompatibility. In FIG. 6 there is shown a virtual address space 150including a process private space 157 of a size greater than or equal toa different system process private space 156, as well as a shared space159 of size greater than or equal to a different system shared space158. In an example embodiment, the different system is a prior systemhaving even split virtual address allocation and a 32 bit virtualaddress size, for example as shown in FIG. 4.

The virtual address space 150 is shown extending from a lowest virtualaddress 152 through a highest virtual address 154. The lowest virtualaddress 152 is shown for example as a 64-bit address equal to00000000.00000000 (hex). The highest virtual address 154 is shown forexample as a 64-bit address equal to FFFFFFFF.FFFFFFFF (hex). Further inFIG. 6 there is shown a lower limit 160 equal to a 64-bit value in whichthe lower 32 bits have a value equal to a highest process privatevirtual address of a different system, for example 00000000.7FFFFFFF(hex). Further shown in FIG. 6 is an upper limit 162 having a valueequal to FFFFFFFF.80000000 (hex). The upper limit 162 includes as itslower 32 bits the lowest shared virtual address of the different system.

The lower limit 160 is shown having the highest bit value (0) of thehighest process private virtual address of the different system extendedinto its upper 32 bits. Similarly the upper limit 162 is shown havingthe highest bit value (1) of the prior system lowest shared virtualaddress extended into its upper 32 bits. A private/shared virtualaddress boundary 164 is shown lying between the lower limit 160 and theupper limit 162. Similarly process private PTEs 168 are shown mappingthose virtual addresses lying below the private/shared virtual addressboundary 164. Also shared PTEs 170 are shown mapping those virtualaddresses lying above (and including) the private/shared virtual addressboundary 164. The process private PTEs 168 and shared PTEs 170 are shownwithin a page table 166. The page table 166 for example is itself mappedinto the virtual address space 150, beginning at a predetermined basevirtual address.

As used herein the term "sign-extending" as applied to a virtual addressrefers generally to the operation of extending the value of a particularbit into those bits located above that bit. The location of theparticular bit varies with the specific instance of sign extension beingdescribed.

In the example embodiment of FIG. 6, the architecture of the CPU asshown in FIG. 1 as element 10 defines longword (32 bit) load operationssuch that values being loaded, including pointers or addresses, are"sign-extended" from bit 31 as they are loaded into registers of the CPU10, for example the registers 18. Such a longword load operation ispresent in existing CPU architectures. Further in the exampleembodiment, the size of the PC and other registers 18 is 64 bits. When a32 bit pointer or address is sign extended during a longword loadoperation, the value in bit 31 of the pointer or address is extendedinto bits 32 through 63 of the destination register (where bits arenumbered beginning with bit 0). For example, when a 32 bit address equalto F0000000 (hex) is loaded into the registers 18 of FIG. 1 using alongword load operation, the resultant 64 bit register value isFFFFFFFF.F0000000 (hex). Similarly, when a 32 bit address equal to7FFFFFFF (hex) is loaded into the registers 18 of FIG. 1 using alongword load operation, the resultant 64 bit register value is00000000.7FFFFFFF (hex).

During the operation of the example embodiment of the elements of FIG. 6and FIG. 1, programs designed to operate on a different system, wherethe different system includes a 32 bit, even split virtual addressspace, continue to operate. In the example embodiment, the even splitallocation of the different system includes a private space in the lowerhalf of its virtual address space, and a shared space in the upper halfof its virtual address space. Those 32 bit virtual addresses in programsdesigned to operate on the different system are sign extended throughlongword load operations loading them into registers, such that theycontinue to point to locations within the prior system process privatespace 156 when they have a bit 31 value of 0, and such that theycontinue to point to locations within the prior system shared space 158when they have a bit 31 value of 1. In this way, to a program havingonly 32 bit pointers, the prior system private and shared spaces appearto be contiguous, exactly as they appeared on the prior (different)system.

While the example embodiment of FIG. 6 describes a system in whichprocess private space is located in the lower addresses of the virtualaddress space, and shared space in the higher addresses, an alternativeembodiment of the invention is applied to systems in which theselocations are reversed. In this alternative embodiment, the addressesbelow the private/shared virtual address boundary 164 are shared space,while the addresses above the private/shared virtual address boundary164 are process private. Similarly in this alternative embodiment thelower 32 bits of the lower limit 160 contain the prior system highestshared virtual address, and the lower 32 bits of the upper limit 162contain the prior system lowest process private virtual address.Accordingly in this alternative embodiment the element 156 indicates theprior system shared space, and the element 158 indicates the priorsystem process private space.

Now with reference to FIG. 7 there is described an example embodiment ofsteps performed to set up a virtual memory system having multi-systemcompatibility, for example as shown in FIG. 6. FIG. 7 shows stepsperformed to determine the private/shared virtual address boundary 164as shown in FIG. 6. The steps of FIG. 7 are performed for example by asoftware process running at system configuration time in response toinputs from a system administrator.

At step 180 a desired ratio of process private space versus shared spaceis input. For example this ratio may be input from a systemadministrator and reflect the work load balance of the computer systemin which the virtual memory system operates. Further at step 180, adesired share space size is calculated responsive to the desired ratioof process private space to shared space and the total size of thevirtual address space provided by the virtual memory system. And finallyin step 180, a desired private/shared virtual address boundary iscalculated responsive to the desired shared space size and the totalsize of the virtual address space. For example, the desiredprivate/shared virtual address boundary is calculated by subtracting thedesired shared space size from the total virtual address size.

The output of step 180 is a desired private/shared virtual addressboundary 182. At decision block 184, the desired private/shared virtualaddress boundary 182 is compared with an upper limit, for example theupper limit 162 as shown in FIG. 6. If at step 184 it is determined thatthe desired private/shared virtual address boundary is greater than theupper limit, then step 184 is followed by step 186. Otherwise step 184is followed by step 188. At step 186, the private/shared addressboundary is set to the upper limit. Step 186 is followed by step 192. Atstep 188 the desired private/shared virtual address boundary is comparedwith a lower limit, for example lower limit 160 as shown in FIG. 6. Ifthe desired private/shared virtual address boundary is less than orequal to the lower limit, then step 188 is followed by 190. Otherwisestep 188 is followed by step 191.

At step 190 the private/shared virtual address boundary is set to thelower limit plus one. Step 190 is followed by step 192. At step 191 theprivate/shared virtual address boundary is set to the desiredprivate/shared virtual address boundary. Step 191 is followed by step192.

At step 192 shared page table entries are set up to map the shared codeand data in shared space. Step 192 is followed by step 194. At step 194private page table entries are set up to map the code and data within aprocess to process private space.

In the example embodiment of FIG. 7, steps 180, 182, 184, 186, 188, 190,191 and 192 are performed by a software process running when thecomputer system is initially configured and booted. Step 194 occurs atprocess creation and during run time of each particular process.

Now with reference to FIG. 8, there is described an example embodimentof a page table structure and virtual address. FIG. 8 shows a virtualaddress 200 including a byte within page field 202, a segment 3 field204, a segment 2 field 206, a segment 1 field 208, and a "signextension" of segment 1 210. The bits in the sign extension of segment 1210 all contain the value of the most significant bit (for example bit42) of segment 1 208. FIG. 8 further shows a page table base register212 (PTBR also shown in FIG. 1 as PTBR 24), a level 1 page table page214, two level 2 page table pages 216 and 218, three level 3 page tablepages 220, 222, and 224, and four data pages 226, 228, 230, and 232. Thenumber of level 2 page table pages, level 3 page table pages and datapages in FIG. 8 is given for purposes of example. Other level 2 pagetable pages, level 3 page table pages and data pages in the presentsystem are omitted from FIG. 8 for purposes of clarity. Further in FIG.8 there is shown a self-mapper 234 located within the level one pagetable page 214 and pointing also to the level one page table page 214.

In the example embodiment of FIG. 8, the PTBR 212 contains a pointer(for example a PFN) to a highest level of the current process's pagetable structure. At that highest level of a given process's page tablestructure, there is shown for example a single page of page tableentries referred to as the level one page table page as shown by element214 in FIG. 8. The level one page table page 214 includes a number oflevel one page table entries. Each level one page table entry maps apage table page at the next lower level in the page table structure, forexample one of the level two page table pages as shown by elements 216and 218 in FIG. 8. Similarly each of the level two page table pages, 216and 218, includes a number of level two page table entries. Each leveltwo page table entry maps a page table page at the next lower level inthe translation hierarchy, for example one of the level three page tablepages shown as elements 220, 222, and 224 in FIG. 8. Further, each ofthe level three page table pages includes a number of level three pagetable entries. Each of the level three page table entries indicates adata page, for example one of data pages shown as elements 226, 228, 230and 232. The data pages indicated by the level three page table entriesare the pages of physical memory which ultimately contain the code ordata mapped to the virtual address 200.

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 8, the memory managementunit 20 translates the virtual address 200 into a physical address basedon the contents of the fields within the virtual address 200. Thesegment one field 208 is an index into the level one page table page,selecting a particular level one page table entry, which indicates aspecific level two page table page for the next stage of translation.The segment two field 206 then is used to index into the selected leveltwo page table page in order to select a level two page table entry,which indicates a specific level three page table page for the nextstage of translation. The segment three field 204 is then used to indexinto that level three page table page to select a level three page tableentry, which in turn indicates a specific page of physical memorycontaining code or data. Next the byte within page field 202 of thevirtual address 200 is used to select a specific byte address within theindicated physical memory page. The page table entry within the levelthree page table page is thus the page table entry ultimately mappingthe virtual address to a page of physical memory.

For example consider the below virtual address in which the bit fieldsyield the following values:

    virtual address=00000000.00800004

Segment one bit field=0

Segment two bit field=1

Segment three bit field=0

Byte within page=4

Further during operation of the elements shown in FIG. 8, theself-mapper 234 is used to map the page table structure itself into thevirtual address space. The self-mapper 234 is a predetermined one of thepage table entries within the level one page table page 214, configuredto point to the beginning of the level one page table page 214. When avirtual address is translated that includes a segment 1 value indexingthe self-mapper 234, the translation logic or code accesses the levelone page table page 214 for a second iteration in the translation, as ifthe level one page table page 214 were a next lower level page tablepage, for example one of the level two page table pages. Thisconfiguration of the self-mapper 234 creates a a portion of the totalvirtual address space, referred to as "page table space", that isexactly large enough to contain all page table entries necessary to mapthe total virtual address space. This configuration of the self-mapperalso causes the page table entries that map the process private portionof the virtual address space are themselves process private, and thepage table entries that map the shared portion of the virtual addressspace are themselves shared. Accordingly, the process private page tableentries within page table space are context switched between processesalong with the process private space they map when operating systemswaps context from one process to another.

In other example embodiments, the page size and/or number of levels inthe page table hierarchy may for example be increased or decreased, thusmapping greater or lesser amounts of virtual space. For example a full64-bit virtual address may be used to provide a larger virtual addressspace. In the example implementation of FIG. 8, an 8 KB page size andthree levels of page table allow the example system to map 8 TB ofvirtual memory for a single process. To map the entire 8 TB addressspace available to a single process, the example embodiment uses 8 GB ofPTEs, each PTE having for example a length equal to 8 bytes.

Accessing a page table entry mapping a predetermined physical page ofmemory

Now with reference to FIG. 9, there is described an example embodimentof steps performed to access a page table entry mapping a pre-determinedphysical page. The steps of FIG. 9 are for example performed by asoftware process executing on the computer system shown in FIG. 1. Atstep 240 an event requiring access to a page table entry mapping aspecific page of physical memory is detected. The specific physical pageis referred to by its PFN, or "page frame number", which is the physicaladdress of that page of physical memory.

The output of step 240 is a PFN 242 identifying the page of physicalmemory mapped by the PTE that is to be accessed. The PFN 242 is passedto step 244. At step 244 the system locates an entry within a physicalpage data base. In the example embodiment, a physical page data base ismaintained by the operating system. The physical page data base includesa number of physical page data base entries. Each one of the physicalpage data base entries includes information regarding an associated pageof physical memory identified by a particular PFN. Searching for aspecific physical-page data base entry within the physical page database may for example be accomplished using conventional searchingtechniques using a given PFN. At step 244 the system locates a physicalpage data base entry 246 corresponding with the PFN 242. The physicalpage data base entry 246 is passed to step 248.

At step 248, the system determines a virtual address of a page tableentry mapping the page of physical memory identified by PFN 242 to avirtual address. The output of step 248 is the virtual address 250 ofthe mapping PTE. The virtual address 250 is passed to step 252. At step252 the system accesses that PTE mapping the physical page identified byPFN 242 using the virtual address 250.

Now with reference to FIG. 10 there is described a first exampleembodiment of an entry within a physical page data base. The physicalpage data base entry shown in FIG. 10 contains information regarding aparticular associated page of physical memory. A specific physical pagedata base entry as shown in FIG. 10 may for example be located withinthe physical page data base through conventional techniques using thePFN identifying the page of physical memory associated with thatphysical page data base entry.

The physical page data base entry in FIG. 10 is shown including PFNstate and current use information 260. The physical page data base entryof FIG. 10 is further shown including a page table PFN (PT₋₋ PFN) field262. The physical page data base entry of FIG. 10 is also shownincluding a PTE index field (PTE₋₋ INDEX) 264.

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 10, a given PFNidentifies for purposes of example a page of physical memory storing thecontents of a virtual page of some process. Accordingly there exists apage table entry that maps a virtual page to that page of physicalmemory identified by the given PFN. The fields within the physical pagedata base entry associated with that PFN point back to that page tableentry. These fields are collectively referred to as the "PTE backlink"or "backlink" of the physical page data base entry.

The backlink for the example physical page data base entry as shown inFIG. 10, consists of two related pieces of information. The first pieceof information is stored in the PT₋₋ PFN field 262. The PT₋₋ PFN field262 contains a PFN identifying a page table page in physical memorycontaining a page table entry that currently maps a virtual page to thepage of physical memory indicated by the PFN associated with thatphysical page data base entry, for example PFN X. The second piece ofbacklink information is an index within that page table page of thespecific page table entry mapping PFN X. That index is stored within thePTE₋₋ INDEX field 264 within the physical page data base entry shown inFIG. 10. In the case where no page table entry currently maps a virtualpage to the page of physical memory indicated by the PFN associated withthat physical page data base entry, then the PTE₋₋ INDEX field 264 andthe PT₋₋ PFN field 262 contain predetermined values indicating thiscondition, for example, zero (0).

FIG. 11 shows an example embodiment of steps performed by a process toaccess a PTE mapping a particular page of physical memory identified bya given PFN. The steps of FIG. 11 are for example performed by asoftware process executing on the computer system shown in FIG. 1.

The example embodiment of FIG. 11 inputs a physical page data base entry270 associated with a predetermined PFN identifying a page of physicalmemory for which a mapping PTE is to be accessed. The physical page database entry 270 is for example the first example physical page data baseentry embodiment as shown in FIG. 10. The physical page data base entry270 is passed to step 272, in which a virtual window is created. Step272 is performed only when the PTE₋₋ INDEX field 264 and the PT₋₋ PFNfield 262 do not contain predetermined values indicating that no pagetable entry currently maps a virtual page to the page of physical memoryindicated by the PFN associated with that physical page data base entry270.

Step 272 includes for example a first sub-step 280 of loading thecontents of the PT₋₋ PFN field from within the physical page data baseentry 270 into a reserved page table entry. The reserved page tableentry (PTE) is for example a predetermined one of the shared page tableentries shown as element 170 in FIG. 6.

In sub-step 282 the system sets a valid bit within the reserved PTE. Atsub-step 284 the system forms the virtual address of the PTE mapping thePFN associated with physical page data base entry 270 by indexing into avirtual window consisting of a page table page mapped by the reservedPTE, using the contents of the PTE₋₋ INDEX field within the physicalpage data base entry 270. This indexing is for example performed bymultiplying the value of PTE₋₋ INDEX by the size of a PTE, and addingthe result to the virtual address of the page of virtual memory mappedby the reserved PTE. The result of this indexing is the virtual address274. The virtual address 274 is then used to access the desired mappingPTE at step 276.

Following step 276 at 278, the system tears down the virtual windowcreated in step 272. Step 278 includes a first sub-step 286 of clearingthe valid bit in the reserved PTE. Following sub-step 286 at sub-step288 the system flushes the translation buffer 22 of any cachedtranslations of virtual addresses within the virtual page mapped by thereserved PTE.

Now with reference to FIG. 12 there is described a second exampleembodiment of a physical page data base entry. The physical page database entry shown in FIG. 12 includes PFN state and current useinformation 290. The remaining fields within the physical page data baseentry of FIG. 12 are the backlink information for the entry. In theexample physical page data base entry shown in FIG. 12, the indexportion of the backlink information has been enlarged in the EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋INDEX field 296 to hold an index not from the beginning of a page tablepage containing the desired mapping page table entry, but an index fromthe beginning of the entire page table structure that altogether mapsthe entire visible virtual address space for a given process. In theexample embodiment, EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX contains an index into a lineararray of page table entries, for example the page table 166 as shown inFIG. 6. To access a specific page table page, EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX ismultiplied by the size of a PTE, for example 8 bytes, and added to abase virtual address mapping the beginning of the page table 166. Theresult is a virtual address of the desired mapping PTE.

The physical page data base entry of FIG. 12 specifically includes a topof tree bit 292, a page table PFN (PT₋₋ PFN) field 294, and an extendedindex to PTE (EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX) field 296. The EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX field296, includes a first sub-field referred to as the high order EXT₋₋PTE₋₋ INDEX bits 300, and a second subfield referred to as the low orderEXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX bits 298. The low order EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX bits 298 areequivalent to the PTE₋₋ INDEX field 264 as described in FIG. 10.

Now with reference to FIG. 13 there is described a second exampleembodiment of steps performed to obtain a virtual address of a pagetable entry mapping a predetermined physical page, using the secondembodiment physical page data base entry as shown in FIG. 12. The stepsof FIG. 13 have three inputs, specifically a physical page data baseentry 302, a requester PTBR value 304, and the current PTBR value 306.

At step 308 in FIG. 13, the system determines whether the predeterminedpage of physical memory indicated by the given PFN is mapped by a sharedpage table entry (PTE). In a first example embodiment of step 308, thedetermination is made by testing a private/shared bit (not shown) withinthe physical page data base entry associated with the PFN of thepredetermined physical page of memory. A first predeterminedprivate/shared bit value indicates that the mapping PTE is within sharedspace, and a second value indicates the PTE is within process privatespace. The private/shared bit is maintained by operating system softwareresponsible for allocating and mapping PTEs to pages of physical memory.In a second example embodiment of step 308, the determination of whetherthe PFN is mapped by a shared PTE is accomplished by determining if thevirtual address of the mapping PTE would be in private or shared spaceby using the EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX value to calculate where the mapping PTElies within the virtual address space. For example, the virtual addressof the mapping PTE is compared with the private/shared virtual addressboundary to determine whether the mapping PTE is mapped to processprivate or shared space. In the example embodiment, those PTEs mappedinto shared space are shared PTEs and those PTEs mapped into processprivate space are process private PTEs.

If it is determined at step 308 that the PFN is mapped by a shared PTE,step 308 is followed by step 310. Otherwise, step 308 is followed bystep 314. In step 310, the system uses the contents of the EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋INDEX field 296 within the physical page data base entry and the basevirtual address of the page table 166 to locate the shared page tableentry for that PFN. As shown in FIG. 12, the EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX portionof the backlink includes both a high order subportion (high order bits300) and low order subportion (low order bits 298). During operation,for shared pages, at step 310, the PT₋₋ PFN portion of the backlink isignored. The entire EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX value is used at step 310 as anindex from the base address of the currently active page table structure(for example page table 166), thus yielding the virtual address at whichthe desired mapping PTE may be accessed. A resulting virtual address 311of the mapping PTE is used by the system in step 312 to access themapping PTE.

At step 314, the system determines whether the PFN is mapped by aprocess private PTE that is within the current virtual address space. Ifit is determined at step 314 that the PFN is mapped by a current privatePTE, step 314 is followed by step 310. For process private pagesbelonging to a process whose context is currently active, the same steps(310, 311 and 312) as used for a shared PTE are applied to yield avirtual address of the mapping PTE. Otherwise, step 314 is followed bystep 316.

For process private pages belonging to a process whose context is notcurrently active, the system uses the backlink information to create avirtual window. At step 316, the system creates a virtual window usingthe contents of the PT₋₋ PFN field 294 within the physical page database entry and the low order bits of the EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX 298, asdescribed in conjunction with PT₋₋ PFN field 262 and the PTE₋₋ INDEXfield 264 of the first example physical page data base entry shown inFIG. 10. The PT₋₋ PFN portion 294 of the backlink is copied to thereserved PTE, and only the low-order EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX bits 298 are usedto index the PTE within the virtual page mapped by the reserved PTE. Thehigh order EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX bits 300 are not used. The output of step316 is the virtual address of the mapping PTE 318, specifically thevirtual address mapped by the reserved PTE and incremented by the numberof PTEs indicated by the low order EXT₋₋ PTE₋₋ INDEX bits 298 . Thevirtual address 318 is used at step 320 by the system to access themapping PTE. Following step 320, the present system tears down thevirtual window by clearing the valid bit in the reserve PTE.

In an alternative exemplary embodiment, in which common code or logic isused to implement the step of accessing the mapping PTE at steps 312 and320, the system need only dismantle the virtual window mapping the pagetable page when the virtual window has actually been established. Thisis recognized by examination of the valid bit within the reserve PTE. Ifthe valid bit is set, then it must be cleared when the virtual window istorn down. If it is clear then the virtual window has not been used, andtherefore need not be torn down. Avoiding tearing down the virtualwindow prevents unnecessary translation buffer operations, such asinvalidation of virtual addresses stored in the translation buffer 22.

The performance gained with the second embodiment physical page database entry occurs for any case where the PT₋₋ PFN portion of thebacklink is not utilized. What is gained is that the system avoidshaving to explicitly map the page table page PFN (PT₋₋ PFN) using thereserved PTE, and the system also avoids having to dismantle the mappinglater.

Now with reference to FIG. 14 there is described an example embodimentof steps performed to determine whether a predetermined physical page ismapped by a current page table entry. The steps described in FIG. 14 arefor example performed within step 314 shown in FIG. 13. The requesterPTBR value 304 is used to determine if the process that requested accessto a process private PTE mapping a predetermined page of physical memoryis currently active. For example such a requesting process may be theinitiator of an asynchronous I/O request. In an example embodiment, therequestor PTBR value 304 is the requesting process's page table baseregister (PTBR) value. This PTBR value is loaded into the PTBR registerwhenever that process is made current. This parameter enables the systemto compare the requester PTBR value 304 to the current contents of thePTBR 306. If there is a match then the requesting process is current onthe CPU. Otherwise the requesting process is not current. Where it isdetermined that the requesting process is current, then any processprivate PTE mapping the page of physical memory indicated by the PFNassociated with the physical page data base entry 330 is within thecurrent virtual address space, and no virtual window need be establishedto access that mapping PTE.

Continuing with reference to FIG. 14, a physical page data base entry330 and a predetermined PFN 329 are input into step 332. Thepredetermined PFN 329 is for example the predetermined PFN 242 as shownin FIG. 9. Further, the physical page data base entry 330 is that entryin the physical page data base associated with the page of physicalmemory indicated by the PFN 329. At step 332, it is determined whetherthe physical page data base entry 330 is associated with the top page214 of a page table tree structure as shown in FIG. 8. Thisdetermination is for example made by examination of a "top of tree" bitin the physical page data base entry. A predetermined value of the topof tree bit indicates that the physical page data base entry 330 isassociated with the top page 214 of the page table structure as shown inFIG. 8.

In an alternative embodiment, the determination of whether the physicalpage data base entry 330 is associated with the top page of a page tabletree structure may be made by comparing the PT₋₋ PFN value in the entrywith the PFN 329. If the two values are equal, then the physical pagedata base entry 330 is associated with the top page 214 of a page tabletree structure as shown in FIG. 8.

If the physical page data base entry 330 indicates that the physicalpage data base entry 330 is associated with the top page of a page tabletree structure, step 332 is followed by step 340. Otherwise step 332 isfollowed by step 334.

At step 334 the system obtains and outputs the value of the PT₋₋ PFNfield from physical page data base entry 330, which is output as PFN337. Further at step 334 the system obtains the physical page data baseentry 336 for the physical page indicated by the PT₋₋ PFN field withinthe physical page data base entry 330. Step 334 outputs that physicalpage data base entry as output 336. The physical page data base entry336 and PFN 337 are then input into step 332, and step 332 is repeated.

At step 340 the current PTBR value 338 is compared with the PT₋₋ PFNvalue within the physical page data base entry last input to step 332.If the two values are equal, step 340 is followed by step 344. Otherwisestep 340 is followed by step 342.

In an alternative embodiment, the comparison at step 340 is made betweenthe PTBR value 338 and the PFN value last input to step 332. Thealternative embodiment gives equivalent results, because due to selfmapping of the page table structure, the physical page data base entryassociated with the top page of the page table structure has a PT₋₋ PFNvalue equal to the PFN of the top page of the page table structure.

At step 344, the present system has determined that the PTE mapping thephysical page indicated by the PFN associated with the physical pagedata base entry 330 is within the current page table. At step 342, thepresent system has determined that the PTE mapping the physical pageindicated by the PFN associated with the physical page data base entry330 is not within the current page table.

FIG. 15 shows an example embodiment of a self-mapped page table 358. Theself-mapped page table 358 is for example the highest level page in ahierarchical tree structure of page table pages as shown in FIG. 8. Inthe example embodiment page table 358 in FIG. 15 corresponds with thelevel one page table page 214 as shown in FIG. 8. For purposes ofclarity, the level 2 page table pages and level 3 page table pages arenot shown in FIG. 15. In an alternative embodiment, the page table 358is a linear array of page table entries.

The page frame number of the self-mapped page table 358 in the exampleembodiment of FIG. 15 is shown contained within the page table baseregister (PTBR) 354. Thus the contents of the PTBR 354 indicates thebase of the self-mapped page table 358. The self-mapped page table 358is shown including a number of page table entries, shown for example aspage table entry 362, page table entry 360, page table entry 356, andpage table entry 352. In the example embodiment shown in FIG. 15, thepage table 358 is one page in length, where a page is eight kilobytes,and the size of each page table entry is eight bytes. Accordingly thereare 1,024 total page table entries in the self-mapped page table 358,numbered from zero through 1023.

Further shown in FIG. 15 is a virtual address space 350. The virtualaddress space 350 is for example shown to include virtual addressesbetween a lowest virtual address 374, shown for example as00000000.00000000 (hex), and a highest virtual address 376, shown forexample as FFFFFFFF.FFFFFFFF(hex). The virtual address space 350 isshown for example divided into 1,024 virtual segments, each virtualsegment being equal to eight gigabytes (8 GBs) in length. The virtualsegments are shown as segment 0 364, segment 1 366, followed by 1,020virtual segments 368, segment 1022 370, and segment 1023 372. Thus thevirtual address space 350 is potentially eight terabytes (8 TB) in size.

Each segment in the virtual address space 350 is mapped by one of thepage table entries found in the self-mapped page table 358. For example,page table entry 362 maps virtual segment 0 364, page table entry 360maps virtual segment 1 366, etc. Page table entry 356, the 1022nd PTE inthe self-mapped page table 358, is the "self-mapper" PTE. Page tableentry 356 maps the 1022nd virtual segment 370 of the virtual addressspace 350. Accordingly during operation of the elements shown in FIG.15, references made to the 1022nd virtual segment 370 in the virtualaddress space 350 result in accesses to page table space. Page tablespace therefore includes those virtual addresses used to access theself-mapped page table 358, and all level 2 and level 3 page table pagesin the example embodiment as shown in FIG. 8.

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 15, the virtual addressspace 350 consists of a collection of identically sized, contiguousaddress range segments, each one mapped by a correspondingly positionedPTE in the page table 358. The base address for page table space in FIG.15 incorporates the index of the chosen self-mapper L1 PTE (3FE(16)) asfollows (see FIG. 8):

    ______________________________________    Segment 1 bitfield = 3FE                      VA = FFFFFFFC.00000000    Segment 2 bitfield = 0                      (aka "PT.sub.-- Base")    Segment 3 bitfield = 0    Byte within page = 0    ______________________________________

Private/shared boundary dividing a self-mapped page table space

FIG. 16 shows an example embodiment of a virtual address space includinga page table space separating a process private space from a sharedspace. FIG. 16 further shows a private/shared virtual address boundarydividing process private page table entries and shared page tableentries, for example contained in a self-mapped page table.

In FIG. 16 a virtual address space 380 is shown including a processprivate space 386, a shared space 388, and a page table space 392. Thevirtual address space 380 is shown extending between a lowest virtualaddress 382 shown for example as 00000000.00000000 (hex) to a highestvirtual address 384 shown for example as FFFFFFFF.FFFFFFFF (hex). Theprocess private space 386 is shown for example within the virtualaddresses below the page table space 392. The shared space 388 is shownfor example within the virtual addresses above the page table space 392.

A private/shared boundary 390 is shown in FIG. 16 dividing the pagetable space 392. The private/shared boundary 390 lies at the higheraddressed end of the level 1 page table page 352. All page table entrieslocated in addresses below the private/shared boundary 390 are processprivate page table entries. All page table entries located in addressesgreater than or equal to the private/shared boundary 390 are shared pagetable entries. The level 1 page table entries that exist between theself-mapper page table entry 356 and the private/shared boundary 390 areprocess private copies of level 1 page table entry values that map theset of shared page table entries that are located in addresses greaterthan or equal to the private/shared boundary 390.

In summary, the page table entries located in addresses below theprivate/shared boundary 390 map the process private space 386, thevirtual space in which those page table entries themselves reside, andinclude the highest level page table entries that map all lower levelpage table entries that map shared space 388. Accordingly, all pagetable entries within the page table space 392 that are located invirtual addresses greater than or equal to the private/shared boundary390 are those lower level page table entries that map shared space 388.Those lower level page table entries that map shared space 388 also mapthe virtual space within page table space in which those lower levelpage table entries themselves reside. Page table entries at locationsgreater than or equal to the private/shared boundary 390 are shared, andare accessible to any current process. Page table entries below theprivate/shared boundary 390, including those page table entries in thehighest level page of the page table structure, are process private, andaccordingly are associated with a specific process. Only when thatspecific process is current are the process private page table entriesassociated with that process accessible.

The page table entry within the page table space 392 having the lowestvirtual address is located at a boundary referred to as page table base393. The address of the first page within the shared space 388 followingthe page table space 392 is referred to as shared space base 397.

FIG. 17 shows an example embodiment of a self-mapped page table space asshown for example in element 392 of FIG. 16 or within element 370 inFIG. 15. FIG. 17 shows an 8 GB page table space 400 beginning at a pagetable base virtual address 402. The page table format of the page tablespace shown in FIG. 17 is for example defined by the tree structuredescribed in FIG. 8. Accordingly within the page table space 400 thereis shown a first set of 1024 level 3 page table pages 408, followed by1021 sets of 1024 level 3 page table pages 410. Following the level 3page table pages 410 and beginning at an address level 2 base (L2₋₋Base) 404 there is shown a level 2 page table page 420, followed by 1021level 2 page table pages 422. Following the 1021 level 2 page tablepages 422, there is at the address level 1 base (L1₋₋ Base) 406 a level1 page table page 424. The level 1 page table page 424 is also shown aslevel 1 page table page 358 in FIG. 15 and level 1 page table page 214in FIG. 8. The address of the level 2 page table page 426 following thelevel 1 page table page 424 is the private/shared virtual addressboundary 427 for the example virtual address space shown in FIG. 17.

Further with reference to the elements shown in FIG. 17, the level 1page table page 424 contains the self-mapper PTE. The relative positionof the self-mapper PTE within the level 1 page table page 424 determinesthe virtual addresses of page table base (PT₋₋ Base) 402, the level 2base address (L2₋₋ Base) 404, and the level 1 base address (L1₋₋ Base)406. Following the level 2 page table page 426 there is shown 1024 level3 page table pages 414. After the 1024 level 3 page table pages 414, theaddress of next higher 8 GBs is the base address (Shared₋₋ Base) 425 ofthe shared space 388 for the virtual address space shown in FIG. 16,also shown as beginning at 418 in FIG. 17. Further, the level 2 pagetable page 426, level 1 page table page 424, 1,021 level 2 page tablepages 422, and level 2 page table page 420 are all shown within a set of1024 level 2 page table pages 412.

FIG. 17 shows the positional effect of choosing a particular high levelPTE to self-map the page tables within PT space. For example theembodiment of FIG. 15 includes a self-mapper page table entry in pagetable entry number 1022. The location of the self-mapper in the exampleembodiment of FIG. 15 not only locates page table space as a whole inthe 1022nd 8 GB segment in virtual memory, it also determines that:

The 1022nd grouping of lowest level page table entries (for exampleL3PTPs) within page table space 400 is the collection of next higherlevel page table pages (for example 1024 L2PTPs 412) that map the othergroupings of L3PTPs (408, 410 and 414), beginning at L2₋₋ Base 404:

    ______________________________________    Segment 1 bitfield = 3FE                      VA = FFFFFFFD.FF000000    Segment 2 bitfield = 3FE                      (aka "L2.sub.-- Base")    Segment 3 bitfield = 0    Byte within page = 0    ______________________________________

Within that block of L2PTPs 412, the 1022nd L2PTP is actually the nexthigher level page table page that maps the L2PTPs, for example, theL1PTP. The L1PTP begins at L1₋₋ Base 406:

    ______________________________________    Segment 1 bitfield = 3FE                      VA = FFFFFFFD.FF7FC000    Segment 2 bitfield = 3FE                      (aka "L1.sub.-- Base")    Segment 3 bitfield = 3FE    Byte within page = 0    ______________________________________

Within the L1PTP 424, the 1022nd page table entry is the one used forself-mapping these page tables, specifically shown as the "self-mapper"page table entry 356 in FIG. 15. In the example embodiment the virtualaddress of the self-mapper L1PTE 200 is for example:

    ______________________________________    Segment 1 bitfield = 3FE                      VA = FFFFFFFD.FF7FDFF0    Segment 2 bitfield = 3FE    Segment 3 bitfield = 3FE    Byte within page = 3FE × 8    ______________________________________

The above described positional relationships within page table space arepreserved in alternative example embodiments in which a different tophigh level page table entry is chosen to be the self-mapper.

During operation of the example self-mapped page table space of FIG. 15and FIG. 17 exactly as much virtual memory as is necessary is reservedfor mapping the page table entries, regardless of page size or pagetable depth in a specific implementation. For example, consider thesegment number bitfields (208, 206, 204) of a given virtual addresshaving the format shown in FIG. 8. Concatenated together, thesebitfields comprise a virtual page number (VPN) portion of that givenvirtual page. During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 17, the VPNmay therefore be used as an index into page table space (from PT₋₋ Base402) to obtain a page table entry mapping that given virtual address.The total size of page table space needed to map all virtual pages isthe number of virtual pages (208, 206, and 204 concatenated) times thesize of a page table entry (for example 8 bytes). The total size of thevirtual address space mapped by page table space is the number ofpossible virtual pages times the page size. Factoring out the number ofvirtual pages from the equation, the difference between the size of pagetable space and the size of the virtual address space is the page sizedivided by the page table entry size, which is for example exactly thesize of the segment 1 bitfield 208 in the example format of the virtualaddress shown in FIG. 8. As a result, the space mapped by a single pagetable entry at the highest level page table page is of exactlysufficient size for mapping all page table entries needed to map aprocess's total virtual address space. Accordingly, no additional systemtuning or coding is required to accommodate future extensions of thevirtual address format shown in FIG. 8 to use bits in the locationsabove Segment 1 208. By definition of the self-map effect, exactly asmuch virtual address space as is required will be available, no more andno less.

Further during operation of the elements shown in FIG. 17, the presentsystem conveniently and efficiently locates a page table entry for agiven virtual address. This results from the fact that the address ofany page table entry is an efficient function of the virtual addressthat the page table entry maps. To determine the virtual address of thepage table entry mapping a given virtual address, the present systembegins by clearing the byte within page bitfield 202 of the givenvirtual address, then shifts the remaining bits of the given virtualaddress such that the bitfield values of Segments 1, 2, and 3 (see FIG.8) now reside in the correspondingly next lower bitfield positions. Thepresent system then writes the vacated Segment 1 field 208 with theindex of the self-mapper page table entry. The present system furthersign-extends the result by extending the value of the most significantbit in the new Segment 1 field 208 into the higher bit locations throughbit 63. The final result is the virtual address of the page table entrythat maps the original given virtual address. Note that this methodapplies also for a given virtual address within page table space,including that of the self-mapper page table entry itself.

FIG. 18 shows steps performed in an example embodiment of a system forprocessing a translation buffer invalidation. At step 430 the presentsystem detects a triggering event, for example clearing of a valid bitwithin a page table entry. At step 430 the present system determines thevirtual address mapped by that page table entry. The output of step 430is the virtual address 432 mapped by that page table entry. The virtualaddress 432 is passed into step 434.

At step 434, the present system determines whether the virtual address432 is either within process private space, or is the virtual address ofa page table entry which maps process private space. For example, atstep 434, in the example embodiment of FIG. 16, the present systemcompares the virtual address 432 with the private/shared virtual addressboundary 390. If the virtual address 432 is less than the private/sharedvirtual address boundary 390, then the virtual address 432 is eitherwithin process private space, or is the virtual address of a page tableentry which maps process private space, and step 434 is followed by step436. Otherwise the virtual address 432 is either within shared space, oris the virtual address of a page table entry which maps shared space,and step 434 is followed by step 438.

At step 436, relevant virtual address translations are invalidatedlocally. Specifically, translations of virtual addresses within the pageof virtual addresses mapped by the page table entry are invalidated in(or "flushed" from) any translation buffer within the central processingunit (CPU) on which the operating system software is currentlyexecuting. That CPU is referred to herein for purposes of example as the"current" CPU.

At step 438, virtual address translations are invalidated globally.Specifically, any translations of virtual addresses within the page ofvirtual addresses mapped by the page table are invalidated in (or"flushed" from) from any translation buffer of each central processingunit (CPU) in the multiprocessor system.

Accommodation of an inaccessible gas in the virtual address space

Now with respect to FIG. 19 there is described an example embodiment ofa virtual address space 450 including an inaccessible gap 456. Thevirtual address space 450 includes a range of virtual addresses betweena lowest virtual address 452 shown for example as 00000000.00000000(hex) and a highest virtual address 454 shown for example asFFFFFFFF.FFFFFFFF (hex). Further in FIG. 19 is shown a midpoint 458equal to the half-way point between the lowest virtual address 452 andthe highest virtual address 454. The inaccessible gap 456 is shownspanning the midpoint 458, such that one-half of the virtual addressesin the inaccessible gap 456 lie below the midpoint 458, and the otherhalf of the virtual addresses within the inaccessible gap 456 are higherthan the midpoint 458. In this way the example inaccessible gap 456 isequidistant from the lowest virtual address 452 and the highest virtualaddress 454. The inaccessible gap 456 is shown spanning a range ofvirtual addresses between a gap base 460, shown for example as00000400.00000000 (hex), and a gap limit 462, shown for example asFFFFFC00.00000000 (hex).

During operation of the elements shown in FIG. 19, one or more operatingsystem routines and/or functions, for example contained within theshared/code data 28 in FIG. 1, allocate and deallocate virtual memorywithin the virtual address space 450 to a requesting process. When theoperating system allocates virtual addresses within the virtual addressspace 450, page table entries are added to a page table structure whichmaps the virtual address space 450 to physical memory. Page tableentries are added to the page table structure by mapping physical memoryto the virtual addresses at which the page table entries are accessed.

An example page table structure is shown in FIG. 8. In the exampleembodiment, page table entries cannot be added to the page tablestructure to map the virtual addresses within the inaccessible gap 456.Accordingly the operating system only allocates virtual memory outsideof the inaccessible gap 456.

FIG. 20 shows an example embodiment of a virtual memory region 470.During execution of a process on a computer system, the operating systemmay provide one or more virtual memory regions, such as virtual memoryregion 470, to the process. The process may subsequently request theoperating system to allocate and deallocate virtual memory within one ormore of those virtual memory regions for the process to use to storedata. As is conventionally done, when virtual memory is allocated, pagetable entries are added to a page table structure. For example, when theoperating system allocates a new range of virtual memory for which thereis no physical memory mapped to the virtual addresses of page tableentries necessary to map the new range of virtual addresses, suchphysical memory is mapped to the virtual addresses of those page tableentries. Such mapping is for example performed by writing the PFNs ofpages of physical memory to page table entries mapping the virtualaddresses of those page table entries necessary to map the new range ofvirtual addresses. For example, to add a given page of page tableentries to the page table structure, a PFN indicating an available pageof physical memory is written to a page table entry mapping the virtualaddresses of that given page of page table entries.

The page table entries added to the page table structure to map a newlyallocated range of virtual addresses may subsequently be used themselvesto map specific pages of physical memory to that newly allocated rangeof virtual addresses. For example, upon a subsequent reference to avirtual address within the newly allocated virtual memory range, a pagefault may be generated and detected, and a PFN indicating an availablepage of physical memory written to a page table entry added to the pagetable structure to map that newly allocated virtual memory location.

The virtual memory region 470 spans a range of virtual memory addressesbetween a region base 472 and a region limit 474. The address of theregion base is shown for example as 00000000.80000000 (hex), and thevalue of the region limit 474 is shown for example as FFFFFFFC.00000000(hex). In the example embodiment of FIG. 20, the currently executingprocess has previously allocated a set of allocated virtual addresses479 between the region base 472 and a first free virtual address 476.Thus for the set of allocated virtual addresses 479, the currentlyexecuting process has previously requested the operating system toprovide page table entries in the page table structure that are capableof mapping the virtual addresses within the set of allocated virtualaddresses 479 to physical memory.

A set of unallocated virtual addresses shown for example as between thefirst free virtual address 476 and the region limit 474, have notpreviously been allocated to the currently executing process.Accordingly no page table entries have been added to the page tablestructure which would be capable of mapping the virtual addresses abovethe first free virtual address 476 and up to the region limit 474.

Further in the example embodiment of FIG. 20, the virtual memory region470 is shown to encompass an inaccessible gap 481 of virtual addressesbetween a gap base 478 and a gap limit 480. The virtual addresses withinthe inaccessible gap 481 are permanently inaccessible, because theembodiment of the underlying memory management system cannot add pagetable entries to the page table structure which would be capable ofmapping virtual addresses within the inaccessible gap 481 to physicalmemory. The present system processes requests for allocation of virtualmemory such that the inaccessible gap 481 is avoided, and the requesteris provided with a starting address of a virtually contiguous range ofallocated virtual memory which is not encompassing or within theinaccessible gap 481.

In an example embodiment, the virtual memory region 470 is described byan associated region descriptor. The region descriptor includesinformation regarding the state of the virtual memory region 470, forexample the present values of the region base 472, first free virtualaddress 476, and region limit 474. In this way a region descriptor ismaintained by the operating system for each virtual memory region, forexample using a predetermined data structure of region descriptors. Whenan operation is performed on a given region, the region descriptorassociated with that region may be used to determine the current stateof that region.

FIG. 21 shows steps performed by an example embodiment of a virtualmemory allocation routine. A first input to the virtual memoryallocation routine of FIG. 21 is a region descriptor 490. The regiondescriptor 490 includes information regarding the virtual memory regionin which the currently executing process is requesting allocation ofaddition accessible virtual memory.

A second example input to the virtual memory allocation routine is shownas a request byte length 492. The request byte length 492 is a length inbytes of the virtual memory requested to be allocated by the currentlyexecuting process.

The region descriptor 490 and request byte length 492 are input to step494. At step 494 the virtual memory allocation routine sets a startingaddress variable to a value of a first free virtual address pointerstored within the region descriptor 490. Further at step 494, thevirtual memory allocation routine sets an ending address variable to thesum of the first free virtual address pointer plus the request bytelength 492.

At step 496 the virtual memory allocation routine compares the endingaddress calculated at step 494 with a gap base and gap limit,corresponding to the gap base 478 and gap limit 480 shown in FIG. 20.The gap base and gap limit are for example system wide values availableto all processes as well as the operating system, or are alternativelypassed to the virtual memory allocation routine within the regiondescriptor 490. If the ending address calculated at step 494 isdetermined to be between the gap base and gap limit step 496 is followedby step 498. Otherwise step 496 is followed by step 500.

At step 498, the virtual memory allocation routine sets the startingaddress variable to the value of the gap limit, and sets the endingaddress variable to the sum of the gap limit plus the byte length. Step498 is followed by step 504.

At step 500 the virtual memory allocation routine determines whethersatisfying the request for additional accessible virtual memorybeginning with the current first free virtual address value would spanthe inaccessible gap. The determination at step 500 is for example madeby determining if the value of the starting address variable is belowthe gap base and whether the ending address is equal to or greater thanthe gap limit. The starting address and ending address used in thecomparisons of step 500 were calculated at step 494.

If at step 500 the virtual memory allocation routine determines that thestarting address is below the gap base and the ending address is equalto or above the gap limit, then the request spans the inaccessible gap.If it is determined at step 500 that the request spans the inaccessiblegap, step 500 is followed by step 502. Otherwise step 500 is followed bystep 504.

At step 502 the virtual memory allocation routine sets the startingaddress variable to the gap limit value and sets the ending addressvariable to the sum of the gap limit plus the request byte length 492.Step 502 is followed by step 504.

In an alternative embodiment, the decisions of step 496 and step 500 arecombined into a single determination of whether the starting addressvariable value is less than the gap base and the ending address variablevalue is greater than the gap base. If this condition is true, then step498 is performed. Step 502 is eliminated in this alternative embodiment.

At step 504 the virtual memory allocation routine determines whether thesize of the virtual memory region associated with the region descriptor490 is overflowed by satisfying the requested additional accessiblevirtual memory. For example, at step 504 the updated value of the endingaddress is compared with a region limit value provided in the regiondescriptor 490. If the ending address is greater than the region limit,then the region is considered full and step 504 is followed by step 506.At step 506 an error is returned to the currently executing processwhich made the request. Otherwise step 504 is followed by step 508.

At step 508 the virtual memory allocation routine updates the first freevirtual address pointer in the region descriptor to point to the updatedvalue of the ending address. Further at step 508 the virtual memoryallocation routine returns the starting address (for example the valueof the starting address variable) of the newly allocated virtualaddresses to the requesting process. Also in step 508, page tableentries are added to the page table structure which may be used to mapphysical memory to the virtual addresses beginning at the returnedstarting address and continuing on for a range of virtual addressesequal to the request byte length 492.

FIG. 22 shows an example of virtual memory allocation as performed bythe example virtual memory allocation routine described in FIG. 21. Avirtual memory region 520 is shown with a range of virtual addressesbetween a region base 522 and a region limit 524. A set of previouslyallocated virtual addresses 539 is shown extending between the regionbase 522 and an old first free virtual address 532. Further in thevirtual memory region 520 is shown an inaccessible gap of virtual memory526 ranging between a gap base 528 and a gap limit 530.

As a result of the virtual memory allocation routine described in FIG.21, a new range of accessible virtual memory 536 has been allocated. Inthe example of FIG. 22, the virtual memory region 520 shows the resultsof an allocation request having a request byte length of 20000 (hex),and an initial associated virtual memory region 470 as shown in FIG. 20.The virtual memory allocation routine returned a starting address to therequester equal to FFFFFC00.00000000 (hex) upon its completion.

Further with reference to FIG. 22, the newly allocated virtual memory536 begins at the gap limit 530 and extends to a new value of the firstfree virtual address 534. Accordingly, the virtual memory allocationroutine as described in FIG. 21 has provided the currently executingprocess with a range of virtual addresses 536. The page table entrieswere added to the page table structure that may be used to map physicalmemory to the virtual addresses within the newly allocated virtualmemory 536.

FIG. 23 shows an example embodiment of steps performed by an exampleembodiment of a virtual memory de-allocation routine. Three inputs areshown in FIG. 23, for example a region descriptor 540, a startingaddress 542, and a byte length 544. The inputs are passed to step 546.At step 546 the example virtual memory deallocation routine determineswhether the deallocation request indicated by the inputs lies within thevirtual memory region described by the region descriptor 540. If therequest does not lie completely with the region described by the regiondescriptor 540, then step 546 is followed by step 548. At step 548, thevirtual memory deallocation routine rejects the deallocation request.Otherwise step 546 is followed by step 550.

At step 550, the virtual memory deallocation routine determines a valuefor an end virtual address variable. For example, the virtual memorydeallocation routine determines the end virtual address variable valueat step 550 by adding the byte length input 544 to the starting address542 and subtracting the size of one page of memory. The end virtualaddress determined at 550 is then "sign-extended" into the upper addressbits of the virtual address. A virtual address is said to be"sign-extended" at step 550 when it is modified such that bits n through(m-1) of the virtual address are equal to the value of bit (n-1) of thevirtual address, where m is the length of the virtual address and n is anumber of bits within the virtual address format used to map the virtualaddress to physical memory, for example as bits 0 through 42 are used inFIG. 8. In this way the present system at 550 allows for the userspecified length given as byte length 544, to include or not include thesize of an inaccessible gap in the example embodiment if the range ofaddresses the requesting process wishes to deallocate spans the gap. Ifthe resultant end virtual address value is greater than or equal to thefirst free virtual address for the region described by the regiondescriptor 540, then some of the virtual memory in the deallocationrequest has previously been deallocated. Accordingly in that case theend virtual address variable is set to the value of the first freevirtual address for that region minus one page, and sign-extended suchthat bits n through (m-1) of the virtual address are set equal to thevalue of bit (n-1). The value of the end virtual address 552 is outputfrom step 550. Moreover, if the starting address 542 is greater than orequal to the first free virtual address, then the example embodimentsimply returns success.

The number of virtual pages to deallocate is then determined at step554. The number of virtual pages to deallocate is calculated at step 554as the difference between a truncated end virtual address value and thestarting address 542, also truncated, divided by the page size, plusone.

In the example embodiment of FIG. 23, the virtual addresses have alength of m bits, and bits 0 through n-1 of are used to map the virtualaddress to a physical address. For example, bits 0 through n-1 of thevirtual address correspond to bits 0 through 42 as shown in FIG. 8,including those bits shown in Segments 1, 2 and 3 as well as the bytewithin page bits. Further in the virtual address of the exampleembodiment of FIG. 23, bits n through m-1 contain all zeros or all onesto match the value of bit n-1, just as in the field 210 shown in FIG. 8.Accordingly in the example of FIG. 23, a gap of inaccessible virtualaddresses exists in the virtual address space, located equidistant fromthe highest virtual address and the lowest virtual address in thevirtual address space, and having a size equal to 2^(m) -2^(n). Furtherin the example embodiment of FIG. 23, a virtual address is `truncated`by setting bits n through m-1 to zero.

Truncating the virtual addresses prior to taking the difference allowsfor one virtual address to be above the inaccessible gap in the exampleembodiment and the other virtual address to be below that gap. In thisway the present system allows for a deallocation range to span aninaccessible gap within the virtual memory region indicated by theregion descriptor 540.

At step 556 the virtual memory deallocation routine deallocates thenumber of pages determined in step 554 beginning for example at the endvirtual address 550 and effectively skipping any pages within theinaccessible gap of virtual addresses within the virtual memory regiondescribed by the region descriptor 540. If the end virtual address 552is the page immediately below the first free virtual address of theregion described by the region descriptor 540, the example virtualmemory deallocation routine updates the first free virtual address topoint to each virtual page that is deallocated as each virtual page isdeallocated. In this way, if an error is encountered and the totalnumber of virtual pages cannot be deallocated, those which weredeallocated contiguous to the old value of the first free virtualaddress are deallocated in spite of the error.

As each virtual page is deallocated at step 556, any page of physicalmemory mapped by the page table entry mapping that deallocated virtualpage is returned to a pool of available physical memory for use byanother process. To this end, the page table entry mapping thedeallocated page of virtual memory, or some subfield thereof, may becleared. For example, at step 556 physical pages mapped to the newlyallocated virtual memory 536 in FIG. 22 would be returned to a pool ofavailable physical memory. However, those virtual pages between the oldfirst free virtual address 532 and the gap base 528, as well as thosevirtual pages not within the inaccessible gap 526 would not be mapped tophysical memory, and therefore no physical pages would be returned tothe pool of available physical memory for those virtual pages. Further,the physical memory used to store a page table entry mapping thedeallocated page of virtual memory may also be returned to the pool ofavailable physical memory on a page by page basis.

At step 558, the virtual memory deallocation routine updates the firstfree virtual address within the region descriptor 540 to point to thenew first free virtual address which may subsequently be allocated tothe currently executing process. For example, if all requested pageswere successfully deallocated, and the end virtual address 552 indicatedthe page immediately below the old first free virtual address value forthe region, then the first free virtual address within the regiondescriptor would be set to the value of starting address 542. Followingstep 558, at 560 the virtual memory deallocation routine returns a valueindicating the status of the deallocation. For example, a successfuldeallocation would return the number of virtual pages successfullydeallocated, or in the alternative return the range of virtual pagessuccessfully deallocated, the number or range not including any virtualpages within the inaccessible gap.

In an alternative embodiment of the steps shown in FIG. 23, the endvirtual address 552 is calculated at step 550 by adding the startingaddress 542 to the byte length 544 and sign-extending the result suchthat bits n through (m-1) of the virtual address are set equal to thevalue of bit (n-1). In the alternative embodiment, the number of pagesto deallocate is determined at step 554 as the difference between atruncated end virtual address value and the starting address 542, alsotruncated, divided by the predetermined page size. Further in thealternative embodiment, at step 556 pages are deallocated beginning withthe page located at the ending virtual address minus one page,sign-extended as in step 550. And if the value of the ending virtualaddress 552 is equal to the first free virtual address, then at step 558the alternative embodiment updates the first free virtual address tohave a value equal to the value of the ending virtual address 552.

FIG. 24 shows an example of a virtual memory region following an exampleexecution of the virtual memory deallocation routine as described inFIG. 23. The example deallocation execution received as inputs a regiondescriptor describing a virtual memory region similar to virtual memoryregion 520 shown in FIG. 22, and a byte length of either00000001.00000000 (hex) (not including the inaccessible gap), orFFFFF801.00000000 (hex) (including the inaccessible gap).

FIG. 24 shows a virtual memory region 570 extending between a regionbase 572 and a region limit 574. The virtual memory region 570 is shownincluding an inaccessible gap 576. A range of deallocated virtual memory582 is shown extending between an old first free virtual address 586 andthe gap limit 580, as well as between the gap base 578 and a new firstfree virtual address 584. In this way it is shown that the virtualmemory deallocation routine described in FIG. 23 successfullydeallocates the amount of virtual memory requested by a currentlyexecuting process, while avoiding an inaccessible gap 576 within thevirtual memory region in which the virtual memory was deallocated.

Non-current page table structure access

FIG. 25 shows steps performed by an example embodiment of a system forproviding access to the page table structure of a non-current process.The example embodiment of FIG. 25 is for purposes of example anoperating system routine or function, shown in FIG. 1 within shared/codedata 28, and called or invoked by a currently executing process.

At step 600, the system of FIG. 25 detects an event requiring access tothe page table structure of a non-current or "target" process. Forexample, the system may detect an event requiring access to processprivate PTEs of a target process, referred to as "target PTEs". One suchevent is for example when the operating system determines that theaddress space of the target process is to be outswapped to disk.

In an example embodiment of the system in FIG. 25, the system begins atstep 600 and continues to execute in shared space, in which is locatedthe operating system code and data, including the stack for thecurrently executing process. After execution of the system begins atstep 600, the contents of process private space are not needed forexecution, as the present system continues to execute from within sharedspace. Further in the system of FIG. 25, within the shared code/datathere is provided a conventional data structure indicating the locationof page tables for non-current processes.

At step 602 the present system modifies the current page table structuresuch that the page table space of the current address space is replacedwith the page table space mapping the page table structure of the targetprocess. Step 602 is performed without a full context switch to thecontext of the target process.

In a first example embodiment, the present system at step 602 modifies aself-mapper PTE within the current page table structure to indicate abase of a page table structure for the target process. Examples of pagetable structure embodiments including a self-mapper PTE are shown inFIG. 8, FIG. 15 and FIG. 17. For example, the present system modifiesthe self-mapper PTE to indicate the base of a level one page table page(L1PTP) of the target process page table structure. Further in theexample embodiment, as is shown in FIG. 17, the portion of the pagetable structure which maps shared space is itself shared for allprocesses. Accordingly, modification of the self-mapper in the pagetable structure has no effect on the execution of the present system ofFIG. 25 within that shared space. The self-mapper PTE may for example bemodified by writing the PFN of the L1PTP of the target process to thePFN field of the self-mapper PTE.

In an alternative example embodiment, at step 602 the system of FIG. 25modifies the contents of the PTBR register 24. For purposes of example,in the current process context, the PTBR 24 points to the mostsignificant page table page in the multi-level page table structure ofthe current process, for example as shown in FIG. 8. In the alternativeembodiment of the system of FIG. 25, the PTBR register is written with aphysical address (PFN) of the most significant page table page of thetarget process's page table structure. Thus, in this alternative exampleembodiment, the process context is completely unchanged except for thefact that the PTBR register has been directed to point to the page tablestructure of the target process.

At step 604, the system of FIG. 25 accesses the page table structure ofthe target process. For example, the process private page table entriesof the target process may be prepared to be outswapped to disk at step604. Accesses to the target process's page table entries are made usingthe same virtual addresses mapped by page table space as would be usedif the target process's context were actually current. For this reason,code paths within the operating system used to access PTEs for a currentprocess may be efficiently shared with those the present system uses toaccess target PTEs. Such shared code paths need not be sensitive as towhether they are accessing target PTEs or those of the current process.

At step 606 the system of FIG. 25 modifies the current page tablestructure such that the page table space of the current address spaceagain maps the page table entries in the page table structure of thecurrent process. In the first example embodiment in which at step 602the self-mapper PTE was modified to point to the page table structure ofthe target process, then at step 606 restoration of the currentprocess's private space (and process private PTEs) is accomplished bywriting the physical address (PFN) of the highest level page table pagewithin the page table structure of the current process to the PFN fieldof the self-mapper PTE in the page table structure of the currentprocess. This write must use a physical address to reference theself-mapper PTE of page table structure of the current process, and notthe virtual address of the self-mapper PTE, since after the prior writeto the self-mapper PTE in step 602, all virtual addresses within pagetable space are mapped to the page table structure of the targetprocess. Accordingly, because the self-mapper PTE is itself a processprivate PTE, the self-mapper PTE of the current process is no longeraccessible. As an alternative, a predetermined virtual address may bereserved in shared space to also map the self-mapper PTE for thispurpose. One of these two techniques must be employed because thecurrent self-mapper PTE ceased to be in the current virtual addressspace at its normal virtual address once it was modified to point to thetarget process's page table structure.

In the alternative example embodiment in which at step 602 the PTBRvalue was modified to point to the page table structure of the targetprocess, restoration of the current process's private space (andcorresponding process private PTEs) is accomplished by writing the PTBRwith the PFN of the current process's highest level page table page.

The DIOBM data structure as used to facilitate I/O accesses

As described above, the virtual address space of the process is relatedto physical memory by a tree-structured collection of page tables asdescribed with regard to FIG. 8. Each page of virtual memory is mappedto physical memory by its specific page table entry in a specific pagetable for that process. The page tables for a process virtual addressspace are themselves contained in the virtual address space of theprocess. As a result the page tables that map the process privateportion of the virtual address space of the given process are accessibleonly if the associated process is currently executing.

Such an arrangement presents a problem for I/O devices. High performanceI/O devices need to be able to perform data transfers directly betweenthe I/O device and the virtual memory of the given process.

Referring now to FIG. 26, a computer system such as that illustrated inFIG. 1 is shown to additionally include I/O device 648. Note, that forthe present discussion, memory 14 is shown to include a process privatememory portion 640, and a shared memory portion 642. The process memoryportion includes data stored in I/O data buffer 647. This datarepresents data that is to be modified by an I/O device 648. A copy ofthe data that is to be modified is shown for example in I/O buffer 649.

The shared portion of memory 642 is shown to include a direct I/O buffermap (DIOBM) data structure 645 and a diobm ceiling cell 646. Becausethese values are stored in shared memory, they are available to anyprocess executing on the CPU, and to any other device coupled to systembus 12, such as I/O device 648. As will become apparent from reading thespecification, the DIOBM data structure is used to facilitate I/Otransfers in the present embodiment of the invention, while the diobmceiling cell 646 is used to select a method of physical I/O addressestranslation.

The I/O subsystem and device drivers use the physical page frame number(PFN) stored in the process PTEs to enable the I/O devices to map theprocess virtual memory addresses into physical memory. Once such an I/Otransfer is initiated, it must be able to proceed under the control ofthe I/O device without the continued involvement of the initiatingprocess and especially if the initiating process is not current anymore.

However, because the PTEs for process private space are stored inprivate space, when the process is switched out the PTE is no longeravailable to provide for physical to virtual address translation.Therefore, a solution must be provided that gives the I/O device driversaccess to the PTEs to allow for them to correctly complete theiraccesses after the current process has swapped out.

According to one embodiment of the invention, there are three differentmethods that may be used to provide PTE access to I/O device drivers.Each of the three methods provides optimum performance for a giventransfer size; however, the advantages to the three are particular tothe associated size.

In determining which of the three methods to use to provide PTE accessto the I/O driver, a common data structure, called the direct I/O buffermap (DIOBM) is used. The DIOBM data structures have three types: a fixedsize DIOBM structure, a variably size DIOBM structure, and a SPTE windowtype DIOBM data structure.

Referring now to FIG. 27, an example of a fixed size DIOBM datastructure layout is shown. A fixed size DIOBM data structure 650 isshown to include a reserved field 652 (the function of which will bedescribed later herein), a count field 654, a subtype field 655, a typefield 656, a fixed sized field 657, a flags field 658, and a vector ofPTE copies 660.

The size of the DIOBM data structure is 88 bytes, including 8 bytes eachfor each of the stored PTEs and additional bytes for the counts, flags,etc. The maximum value of 9 stored PTEs was selected because it issufficient to handle the majority of I/O requests, although the majorityof requests are mapped by 1, 2 or 3 PTEs.

The reserved field 652 is used for storing a pointer to other DIOBM datastructures as will be described in more detail below. The count field654 is for storing a count of the number of PTEs that are stored as thevector of PTE copies 660. The subtype and type fields, 655 and 656respectively, are common fields to all types of Virtual Memory System(VMS) data structures, and store unique identifiers for every type ofprivileged data structure. In the present embodiment, the `type` fieldidentifies the data structure as a `miscellaneous` type of datastructure of subtype DIOBM.

The fixed size value field 657 stores the value 88 which is the totalsize of a fixed size DIOBM structure. The size field is also a commonfield to all types of VMS data structures, and is written to when thestructure is allocated from shared memory and is read when the structureis deallocated and returned to the pool of available memory. Asmentioned above, the present embodiment the fixed size value used was 9PTE vectors, although it should be readily understood that that numbermay be increased or decreased depending upon the requirements of the I/Osubsystem and the constraints of the memory address space.

The flags field includes the following flags: WINDOW, AUX₋₋ INUSE, andREL₋₋ DALLOC, among others. For a fixed size DIOBM data structure, noneof these flags are set, and thus the function of these flags will bedescribed with relation to the other types of data structures.

Thus the DIOBM data structure 650 is a small fixed size data structurethat can be imbedded in various I/O control data structures with minimalimpact on system memory consumption. A DIOBM can also be separatelyallocated from shared system space memory by a device driver as needed.

If the PTEs needed to map the range of virtual memory spanned by the I/Otransfer fit into the fixed size DIOBM, the PTEs are copied into thevector field 660 of the DIOBM data structure 650. The device drivers inthe I/O subsystem are given a pointer to the PTEs within the DIOBM andsubsequently access the PTE copies within the DIOBM as if they wereaccessing the page table.

However, if the number of PTEs needed to map the I/O transfer exceedsthe capacity of the fixed size DIOBM, a decision must be made as towhether to generate a second, variably sized DIOBM or whether to use adifferent method of PTE translation.

A variably sized DIOBM is a DIOBM can be used to store any number of PTEvectors. The variably sized DIOBM is typically used for very large andfairly atypical I/O transfers. However, there are some drawbacks to theuse of the variably sized DIOBM data structure. First, the system memoryconsumption of a variable size DIOBM is directly proportional to thesize of the I/O transfer; therefore, consideration must be given as towhether or not system resources should be allocated to storing thesePTEs. Second, the performance impact required to copy the necessary PTEsis also proportional to the I/O transfer size and will begin to dominateother performance costs as the transfer size increases.

Accordingly, a ceiling or limit must be established on the number ofPTEs that should be stored in the variably sized DIOBM data structure.The ceiling value is stored in a system-wide data cell 646 (see FIG.26), and the procedure used to set the ceiling value will be discussedlater herein.

If it is determined that the number of PTEs is within the ceiling value,then a variably sized DIOBM data structure will be selected for use. Avariably sized DIOBM data structure is always linked to a fixed sizeDIOBM data structure. For example, referring now to FIG. 28, a layout ofa fixed sized DIOBM structure 680 coupled to a secondary DIOBM 690 isshown.

The fixed DIOBM structure 680 includes field 682 (previously a reservedfield) for storing a pointer to the secondary, variably sized DIOBMstructure 690. The `count` field 684 is set to a 0, since the `count`field of the variably sized DIOBM will be used instead. The type,subtype and fixed size field (685,686, and 687, respectively) areidentical to that described in FIG. 27. The flags field now has theAUX₋₋ INUSE set. This flag indicates that a variably sized DIOBM wasdynamically created for this I/O transaction. The REL₋₋ DEALLOC flag inthe flags field 698 in the variably sized DIOBM is set to indicate thatthe DIOBM 690 should be automatically deallocated. These flag indicatethat a variably sized DIOBM data structure was dynamically created forthis I/O transaction, and that the DIOBM 690 should be automaticallydeallocated when the I/O transaction is complete and the fixed sizeDIOBM data structure 680 is released.

Note that when using a variably sized DIOBM data structure, field 689does not include any vectors for PTEs. Rather, all of the PTE vectorswill be stored in field 699 of the variably sized DIOBM data structure690.

Other fields of the secondary DIOBM data structure 690 are defined asfollows. The count field 694 includes a count of PTE entries stored infield 699. The count field 694 contains the count of PTE entries storedin the PTE vector field 699. The flags field has none of the flag valuesset. The actual size field 697 stores the total size of this DIOBMstructure 690. It includes the bytes needed to store the vector of PTEentries plus the 16 bytes needed for the other fields (692, 694, 695,696, 697 and 698) at the beginning of the DIOBM structure. In thisembodiment, the PTE vector 699 will contain sufficient room toaccommodate more than 9 PTE entries and the value stored in 697 will begreater than 88.

If the PTE count exceeds the DIOBM ceiling value stored in cell 646(FIG. 26), or if there is currently insufficient system-dynamic memoryto allocate the required secondary DIOBM, a different method of PTEtranslation is employed. This third method creates a window of sharedsystem virtual address space onto the required page table pages in theprivate portion of the process page tables. The procedure for creating awindow is similar to that described previously, however, there are someparticulars with regard to the I/O transfer as will become apparent.

Referring now to FIG. 29, the procedure used to create an SPTE windowonto process page tables will now be described with reference to someelements shown in FIG. 26.

At step 700a, the I/O buffer 647 in process memory with which the I/Odevice 648 is communicating is `locked` into physical memory by thecurrent process. By definition, the page table entries that map theuser's buffer must be present in virtual memory since the process iscurrent. The page table entries that map the I/O buffer are contained inone or more virtually contiguous page table pages, shown as 718 and 720in FIG. 30.

At step 700b, the number of page tables (hereinafter referred to as NPT)needed to map the I/O buffer is calculated from the size of the I/Obuffer, its alignment in virtual memory, and the number of page tableentries that fit into a single page. At step 701, the NPT page tablepages are `locked` into physical memory.

At step 702, NPT virtually contiguous system page table entries areallocated. Accordingly, it can be seen that since only one SPTE ismapped for each page table page (which may include a number of PTEs),the memory consumption is small even for extremely large I/O transfers.This set of SPTEs provides the virtual to physical address mapping for arange of shared system virtual address space.

At step 704, the PFN of the first of the NPT allocated SPTEs isinitialized to contain the value of the PFN of the first of the processpage table pages that contain the PTEs that map the I/O buffer. Inaddition, all of the remaining NPT-1 allocated SPTEs are initializedsuch that the PFN of each successive SPTE is set to the PFN of eachsuccessive process page table page. In this way, the process page tablesare mapped into a range of shared system virtual address space.Effectively, this range of shared system address space becomes a`window` into the process page tables and the PTEs that map the I/Obuffer.

At step 706 a pointer within this window in shared system space is givento the device driver and the I/O subsystem. This pointer effectivelypoints to the first PTE that maps the I/O buffer.

It should be noted that the PTE window exists only for the duration thatthe buffer is locked down for the I/O transaction. During the I/O bufferunlock, the system space pages used as the window on to the page tablepages would be rendered invalid and then deallocated. The temporarydouble mapping of page tables would, therefore, evaporate.

Referring now to FIG. 30, an example block diagram of a PTE windowcreated using the process provided in FIG. 29 is shown. The memory 710is shown apportioned into process private memory 712 and shared memory714. By way of example only, two SPTE entries 716a and 716b are shown,each pointing to page table pages 718 and 720, respectively. It shouldbe understood that only 4 page table entries are shown for each pagetable page for ease of description only, and that in practice the pagetable pages are arranged as previously described in FIG. 8.

The SPTEs 716a and 716b each provide a mapping for one page of sharedvirtual address space. In this example, SPTE 716a maps the address 712awhich is the lowest address of the PTE window 721b. Since there are twoSPTEs in this example, the range of the PTE window 721b is two pages.Moreover, because the PFN field of SPTE 716a has been set to the PFN ofPT1 and the PFN of SPTE 716b has been set to the PFN of PT2, an accessto a system virtual address in the range of 721b results in an actualaccess to the process page table pages 718 and 720.

Because the PTE window is in shared system space, it can be used toaccess page tables in process private memory regardless of whether thatpage is current. The SPTEs in the shared system memory are the onlyadditional real memory resources required to realize the window and area small fraction of the shared system memory that would be required tocontain copies of all the PTEs that map the I/O buffer.

The pointer within the window in shared system virtual space that isprovided to the device drivers and I/O subsystem is shown as pointer722.

The SPTE stack 716 thus provides a window onto the PTEs for each processmay be obtained regardless of whether or not the process is current.Because only the SPTEs are stored in shared memory, a much smalleramount of memory resources are used for the I/O transfer.

In the unlikely event of insufficient SPTEs, the initiating process issuspended until additional system memory becomes available. When theinitiating process is resumed, a determination is made as to whether thewindowing is the still the best alternative at that time, or whether asecondary DIOBM data structure would provide the optimum solution.

Referring now to FIG. 31, a layout of the fixed sized DIOBM structurewhen a PTE window is created using SPTEs is shown. Field 742 is unused.Field 744 now includes a count of the SPTEs that are allocated for theI/O transaction. Field 747 contains the size of a fixed size DIOBM whichis 88 bytes in this embodiment. The flag bit PTE₋₋ WINDOW is set in flagfield 748. Field 749 stores a pointer (such as the address of SPTE 716ain FIG. 30) to the first system PTE that is allocated. Field 750 storesthe system virtual address that is mapped by system PTE pointed to by749. This is the lowest address for the PTE window (such as address 712ain FIG. 30). The remaining space 751 in the fixed size DIOBM 740 isreserved.

Regardless which method is employed, the fixed size DIOBM datastructure, the variably sized DIOBM data structure, or the windowingmethod, the I/O subsystem and device drivers are given a pointer withinshared system virtual address space to the required PTE values. In allcases, the fixed size DIOBM data structure serves as the common handle.When the I/O transfer is completed, this DIOBM data structure is passedto a single system routine that deallocates the secondary DIOBM ordeallocates the SPTEs as appropriate.

As mentioned above, the tradeoffs must be used when determining whetherto use the secondary DIOBM transfer method, or to use the PTE windowingmethod. The determination is made through the examination of the valueof the DIOBM ceiling cell 646 (FIG. 26). Thus it is the ceiling valuethat dictates how the system resources are to be used to perform the I/Otransfer; i.e. whether SPTEs should be used with an additional level oftranslation to provide a window, or whether a vector of PTE copies areto be stored.

The ceiling value is a system wide data cell for controlling the switchfrom the use of PTE copies method to the use of the PTE window.Performance studies have demonstrated that for large I/O transfers, therun-time overhead for the secondary DIOBM method is relatively low butrises linearly with buffer size. In contrast, the run-time overhead forthe PTE window method is initially relatively high but is essentiallyfixed regardless of I/O transfer size. Therefore, as the buffer sizeincreases, the overhead of the secondary DIOBM method approaches theoverhead of the SPTE window method until finally the fixed overhead ofthe PTE window method remains lower than the continually rising cost ofthe secondary DIOBM data structure method.

Although the overhead of the PTE window method does not varysignificantly as a function of the I/O transfer size, it issignificantly higher on a multiprocessor system when compared to auniprocessor system. This is because invalidation of the PTE window mustbe propagated to all processors in a multiprocessor system. Therefore,the crossover point, as a function of the PTE count, was experimentallyderived for uniprocessor and multiprocessor systems.

The system wide data ceiling value 646 cell contains the maximum numberof PTEs that are to be stored in a variably size DIOBM data structure.On system bootstrap, it is initialized to the appropriate value based onwhether the system is a uniprocessor or multiprocessor system. Foruniprocessor systems, the ceiling value is typically in the range of 94PTEs while for multiprocessor systems, the ceiling is in the range of430 PTEs. It should be noted, however, that the present invention is notlimited to providing an initial ceiling value. Rather it is the abilityto dynamically control how the I/O transfer is to be performed that is akey concept of the present invention. Thus, because the ceiling value issystem wide, it may be updated at any point during execution responsiveto resource availability and the requirements of the various processes.

Referring now to FIG. 32, a flow diagram illustrating the entire dynamicmapping process is provided. At step 760 a fixed sized DIOBM isobtained. Because it is of fixed size, a DIOBM can be embedded in eachstandard system I/O request packet. Alternatively, a fixed size DIOBMstructure can be allocated from shared memory.

At step 761, the number of PTEs that are required to map the I/O bufferare computed. The number of PTEs is a function of the size of the I/Otransfer, the page alignment of the starting virtual address of the I/Obuffer, and the page size.

At step 762 the computed number of PTEs required to map the I/O bufferis compared against the number of PTEs that can be contained in a fixedsize DIOBM. As mentioned previously, in the present embodiment, a valueof 9 is used, though other values may also be effective.

At step 763 if the computed number of PTEs will fit into the fixed sizeDIOBM, the PTEs are copied into the PTE vector, and at step 770, apointer to the DIOBM is passed to the I/O driver.

If at step 762 it was determined that the computed number of PTEsexceeded the capacity of a fixed size DIOBM, then at step 764, thecomputed number is compared against the DIOBM ceiling value stored incell 646 (FIG. 26).

If the computed number of PTEs is less than or equal to the ceilingvalue at step 766a it is then determined if there is sufficient sharedsystem memory to create a sufficiently sized secondary DIOBM. If thereis sufficient shared system memory, at step 766b, a secondary DIOBM iscreated, linked into the fixed size DIOBM data structure as shown inFIG. 28, the PTEs that map the I/O buffer are copied to the PTE vectorin the secondary DIOBM, and a pointer to the secondary DIOBM is passedto the I/O driver.

If, at step 764, it is determined that the computed number of PTEs isgrater than the ceiling value, or if at step 766a, there is insufficientshared system memory for a sufficiently sized secondary DIOBM structure,then at step 765 it is determined if there are sufficient system PTEs tocreate a sufficiently sized PTE window. That is, a set of SPTEs isrequired such that there is one SPTE for each process page table pagecontaining the PTEs that map the I/O buffer. When there are sufficientSPTEs, at step 768 the SPTE widow is created as described in FIG. 29,and the fixed size DIOBM structure is initialized as shown in FIG. 31.Then, at step 770, a pointer within the created PTE window in sharedsystem space is passed to the I/O driver.

While the invention has been described with reference to specificexample embodiments, the description is not meant to be construed in alimiting sense. Various modifications of the disclosed embodiments, aswell as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to personsskilled in the art upon reference to this description. It is thereforecontemplated that the appended claims will cover any such modificationsor embodiments which fall within the true scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A variable split virtual memory system,comprising:a virtual address space of virtual addresses simultaneouslyavailable to a given process; a process private space within saidvirtual address space, said process private space including virtualaddresses below a private/shared virtual address boundary, said processprivate space accessible only to said given process; a shared spacewithin said virtual address space, said shared space including virtualaddresses above said private/shared virtual address boundary, saidshared space accessible to a plurality of processes including said givenprocess; and wherein said private/shared boundary is greater than ahighest process private virtual address of an even split virtual memorysystem, and wherein said private/shared boundary is less than or equalto a lowest shared virtual address of said even split virtual memorysystem.
 2. A variable split virtual memory system, comprising:a virtualaddress space of virtual addresses; a process private space within saidvirtual address space below a private/shared virtual address boundary,said process private space accessible only to said given process; ashared space within said virtual address space equal to or above saidprivate/shared virtual address boundary, said shared space accessible toa plurality of processes including said given process; and wherein saidprivate/shared boundary is greater than a lower limit, a lower `m` bitsof said lower limit equal to a highest process private virtual addressof an even split virtual memory system, and wherein each bit of saidlower limit located above said lower `m` bits contains a value equal tozero.
 3. The variable split virtual memory system as in claim 2, whereinsaid private/shared boundary is less than or equal to an upper limit, alower `m` bits of said upper limit equal to a lowest shared virtualaddress of said even split virtual memory system, and wherein each bitof said upper limit located above said lower `m` bits contains a valueequal to one.
 4. The variable split virtual memory system of claim 3,wherein said variable split virtual memory system has a virtual addresssize equal to `n`, and where `n` is larger than `m`.
 5. A variable splitvirtual memory system, comprising:a virtual address space of virtualaddresses; a process private space within said virtual address spacebelow a private/shared virtual address boundary, said process privatespace accessible only to said given process; a shared space within saidvirtual address space equal to or above said private/shared virtualaddress boundary, said shared space accessible to a plurality ofprocesses including said given process; and boundary setting means forsetting said private/shared boundary to a value greater than a lowerlimit, a lower `m` bits of said lower limit equal to a highest processprivate virtual address of an even split virtual memory system, andwherein each bit of said lower limit located above said lower `m` bitscontains a value equal to zero.
 6. The variable split virtual memorysystem as in claim 5, wherein said boundary setting means further setssaid private/shared virtual address boundary to a value less than orequal to an upper limit, a lower `m` bits of said upper limit equal to alowest shared virtual address of said even split virtual memory system,and wherein each bit of said upper limit located above said lower `m`bits contains a value equal to one.
 7. The variable split virtual memorysystem of claim 6, wherein said boundary setting means furthercomprises:input means for obtaining a desired shared space size;conversion means, responsive to said input means, for converting saiddesired shared space size to a proposed private/shared boundary, saidproposed boundary equal to a total size of said virtual address spaceminus said shared space size; and comparison means, responsive to saidconversion means, for comparing said proposed boundary with said lowerlimit, and for setting said private/shared virtual address boundary tosaid lower limit plus one if said proposed boundary is less than orequal to said lower limit.
 8. The variable split virtual memory systemof claim 7, further comprising:second comparison means, responsive tosaid conversion means, for comparing said proposed boundary with saidupper limit, and for setting said private/shared virtual addressboundary to said upper limit if said proposed boundary is greater thansaid upper limit.
 9. The variable split virtual memory system of claim8, further comprising:shared page table forming means, for forming oneor more shared page table entries mapping said shared space; and privatepage table forming means, for forming one or more process private pagetable entries mapping said process private space.
 10. The variable splitvirtual memory system of claim 9, wherein said shared page table formingmeans operates at boot time.
 11. The variable split virtual memorysystem of claim 10 wherein said private page table forming meansoperates at process creation.
 12. A variable split virtual memorysystem, comprising:a virtual address space of virtual addressessimultaneously available to a given process; a process private spacewithin said virtual address space, said process private space includingvirtual addresses equal to or above a private/shared virtual addressboundary, said process private space accessible only to said givenprocess; a shared space within said virtual address space, said sharedspace including virtual addresses below said private/shared virtualaddress boundary, said shared space accessible to a plurality ofprocesses including said given process; and wherein said private/sharedboundary is greater than a highest shared virtual address of an evensplit virtual memory system, and wherein said private/shared boundary isless than or equal to a lowest process private virtual address of saideven split virtual memory system.
 13. A variable split virtual memorysystem, comprising:a virtual address space of virtual addresses; aprocess private space within said virtual address space equal to orabove a private/shared virtual address boundary, said process privatespace accessible only to said given process; a shared space within saidvirtual address space below said private/shared virtual addressboundary, said shared space accessible to a plurality of processesincluding said given process; and wherein said private/shared boundaryis greater than a lower limit, a lower `m` bits of said lower limitequal to a highest shared virtual address of an even split virtualmemory system, and wherein each bit of said lower limit located abovesaid lower `m` bits contains a value equal to zero.
 14. The variablesplit virtual memory system as in claim 13, wherein said private/sharedboundary is less than or equal to an upper limit, a lower `m` bits ofsaid upper limit equal to a lowest process private virtual address ofsaid even split virtual memory system, and wherein each bit of saidupper limit located above said lower `m` bits contains a value equal toone.
 15. The variable split virtual memory system of claim 14, whereinsaid virtual memory system has a virtual address size equal to `n`, andwhere `n` is larger than `m`.